Pentax Spotmatic Camera Review – One of the Longest-Lived Mechanical Cameras Ever Made

Pentax Spotmatic Camera Review – One of the Longest-Lived Mechanical Cameras Ever Made

2000 1125 Chris Cushing

Volkswagen produced the Beetle in one form or another for more than six decades. Six decades of building one of the most simple, spartan family cars on the planet. And the Beetle outlasted every single one of its competitors. The Citroen 2CV lasted into the 1990s and the original Fiat 500 evolved radically until its final near un-recognizable descendant finished its run in 2000. The Beetle lasted until 2003. The Beetle even survived George Harrison. With a fundamental quality that carries a design beyond what anyone expected to be its useful life, some things are simply survivors.

When Pentax debuted the Spotmatic concept at Photokina in 1960, I’m certain no one at Pentax expected the basic chassis to survive in series production almost into the new millennium. The K1000, which we have called the ultimate student camera, stayed in production until 1997, 33 years after the original Spotmatic entered production. The biggest changes over these 33 years was the additions of a much improved lens mount, a flash shoe, and a new switch for the open-aperture meter. That’s all, folks.

Of course, the Spotmatic is best remembered for bringing through the lens metering to a mass market camera, thereby helping amateurs achieve better results much more easily.

An Exercise In Simplicity

The top plate of an original Spotmatic is a simple reflection of its spartan spec sheet. It has five things on it – a rewind crank, a shutter speed dial with ISO selector, a shutter release, and a film advance lever with integrated film counter. The camera also boasts a switch for the meter next to the lens mount, a self-timer on the fascia, and a battery compartment cover on the bottom plate. That’s it.

If you need a camera that facilitates restless fidgeting with levers, knobs, and dials, the Spotmatic is a poor choice.

The meter has two positions, on and off, and the meter is running from when you turn it on until you take a picture. Firing the shutter turns the meter back off, which brings a few practical or impractical side effects. Because the Spotmatic only meters stopped-down, having the meter on when composing a shot is not desirable, as it darkens the frame dramatically. This means the workflow involves either composing, metering and then shooting, or metering, switching the meter back off, then composing and shooting.

Like the Beetle, the Spotmatic offers little in the way of toys. There are no shooting modes, and even the meter readout is a simple center-point needle. Since the camera’s relationship with the lens aperture is effectively binary, the Spotmatic doesn’t even offer match-needle metering, like my Canon Ftb.

Build Quality

It’s easy to mistake heft for quality, and while the Spotmatic has a lot of the latter, it has surprisingly little of the former. At 681g, the Spotmatic is about 70g lighter than a Canon Ftb. Though heavier than an Olympus OM-1, and most compact manual focus SLRs, it’s not an unwieldy monster. And let’s be real, until the OM-1 began the size conversation, few serious SLRs were smaller than the Spotmatic.

Despite the lack of heft, the camera feels extremely well made. Maybe not on Leica’s level, but well beyond anything made by Canon, Nikon or Olympus at the time. There is very little play in the film advance lever, and every control on the camera operates with some reassuring resistance. The tired metaphor of “it feels like a well oiled gun,” doesn’t really work here. Most of the controls on a Spotmatic feel like the adjusters on a lathe. They’re smooth, deliberate, and purposeful.

As Josh noted when this camera’s youngest relative last graced our pages, much of this functional elegance worked its way out of the camera by the end of the run. Where the K1000 can be clattery, the Spotmatic is refined. Indeed, of my elderly SLRs, only the OM-1 is quieter (though it feels far less sturdy).

The Meter

Its namesake is the Spotmatic’s greatest asset. While meters had appeared on cameras prior to the Spotmatic, none had integrated the feature so slickly. The Photomic finder on the Nikon F added a lot of heft both physically and visually to the camera. The original version didn’t offer TTL metering, and instead added a second meter-finder to the outside of the prism. Later variants did offer TTL metering, but still doubled the size of the finder and added a lot of weight to the upper half of the camera.

The Spotmatic integrated all meter functions into the body. This may sound trivial today, as modern shooters need to go out of their way to find new cameras without meters, but when the concept debuted in 1960 it was virtually unheard of. By the time the consumer model launched in 1964, Pentax had been beaten to the market by both the Topcon RE Super, and the cumbersome-looking Alpa 9d. Unlike the Topcon, the Spotmatic was a lasting hit.

Pentax’s original concept used true spot metering off a very small area, the final production camera used center-weighted metering for greater ease of use. The overwhelming majority of SLRs made for the next two decades followed suit.

I have two Spotmatics, and the meter on both is reasonably accurate. I tend not to use these cameras for shooting slide film, but the meter works brilliantly for more forgiving films. Because the readout is a single needle, exposure compensation in the modern sense is not really possible. There is no compensation dial with 1/3 stop clicks. If your subject is backlit, position the needle a little higher on the scale, and if the subject is dark position it a bit lower.

Unlike many later cameras with internal meters, the Spotmatic does not rely on a PX625 mercury cell battery. Pentax used smaller PX400 cells, and equipped the camera with an internal voltage regulator circuit. While the original 1.35v PX400 is no longer available, that is not really important. I use 1.55v silver oxide 387S cells in my Spotmatic, though in a pinch virtually any small hearing aid battery over 1.35v should work.

Too Many Lenses

The M42 mount has some drawbacks. The small lens throat means that fast telephotos are uncommon. Transmitting information from lens to camera is also challenging because there is nowhere for the necessary mechanisms to go. While some M42 lenses and bodies allow for open-aperture metering, most do not.

Of course, this is easy to forgive when you consider just how many lenses were produced in M42. Because the mirror box on the Spotmatic was designed around the deep, protruding rear element of the 7-element Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4, the Spotmatic is compatible with more of them than most. This database has nearly 1,600 M42 mount lenses, with manufacturers ranging from Zeiss, to Schneider-Kreuznatch, to Voigtlander, and dozens I’ve never heard of.

My current M42 lens collection includes mostly Super-Takumar lenses, but that’s mostly because I am a little obsessed with making everything match. I have a lovely Tamron 28mm f/2.8 adapted to M42 which mostly gets used on my Fuji X-E1. The focus ring grip doesn’t match the ribs on the Spotmatic’s meter switch. In my mind, it just doesn’t work. If you’re not like me, the extraordinary lens selection is a treasure trove.

A Large, Old Family Tree

There are many Spotmatics and descendants of this camera today, and the one we’ve focused on here, the original Spotmatic, is the most challenging to use. Depending on your priorities as a shooter, it is likely that there is a Spotmatic variant or descendant that fits your needs and shooting style.

These descendants include the simpler SP500 and SP1000, which were like the original only without a self-timer. The updated Spotmatic II and IIa offered a wider range of meter-friendly ISOs, added a flash shoe, and moved the flash sync ports to a more ergonomically-correct location. In 1971, the Japan-only Electro-Spotmatic became the first camera ever to offer an Aperture-Priority shooting mode.

The final Spotmatic variant, the Spotmatic F, is the only member of the family to offer open-aperture metering. The Spotmatic F lasted until 1976, when Pentax finally retired the M42 mount in favor of the new K-Mount.

This was not the end of the Spotmatic, however. When the K-mount cameras debuted, most of the original new cameras retained the Spotmatic’s chassis. The simple, reliable K1000 outlasted all of the other original K-mount cameras in production, and stayed on the market until 1997. While the K1000 offers a few features not seen on the original Spotmatics, such as a depth of field preview lever on the body rather than on the lens, the rest of the camera is little changed.

Should You Shoot With a Spotmatic

Yes. Absolutely. Every photographer should own a Spotmatic. I’m not just saying that because my editor owns a camera shop. With the value proposition inherent in the machine, there’s really no downside to owning a Spotmatic. The M42 lens that came with your Spotmatic will work on your mirrorless camera, but it is also easily adaptable to most SLRs. M42 lenses offer infinity focus with only a basic adapter on most common SLRs, though a more specialized adapter is required for Nikon shooters.

Of course, many of these lenses are excellent. The 50mm f/1.4 that was originally included on most Spotmatics is one of our favorites, and the 28mm f/3.5 and 135mm f/3.5 are wonderful, user-friendly pieces as well.

Like the Beetle, the Spotmatic can never be called the most sophisticated tool for its particular job, but it is one of the most enduring. Like the Beetle, it’s also endearing. Decades on, the Spotmatic still has fans and supporters, myself included.

I wish I could put forward a budget alternative, but there really isn’t one. The Spotmatic is one of the cheapest SLRs around. For those of you looking for a camera with similar ergonomics, less metal in the chassis and body, as well as a higher price tag, try a Bessaflex.

Ready to try the Spotmatic?

Get it on eBay

Get it from our own F Stop Cameras

Get it on Amazon

Follow Casual Photophile on Facebook and Instagram

[Some of the links in this article will direct users to our affiliates at B&H Photo, Amazon, and eBay. By purchasing anything using these links, Casual Photophile may receive a small commission at no additional charge to you. This helps Casual Photophile produce the content we produce. Many thanks for your support.]

Chris Cushing

Chris Cushing is a freelance writer, pedant and photographer who still plays with cars. Based in Albany, New York, he can often be seen aimlessly wandering the Northeast with a camera twice his age slung around his neck.

All stories by:Chris Cushing
  • I recently found a black Spotmatic at my local thrift store for next to nothing and have been pleasantly surprised with its performance. It’s become one of my favorite film bodies and the takumar lenses are a joy to use as well.

    • Oh, what variant? Black original Spotmatics are VERY rare, and while Spotmatic IIs and ESs in black are a little more common, they still didn’t make a ton.

      Happy shooting!

      • It says Honeywell Pentax Spotmatic on the front with serial number 2857722. It looks exactly the same as the phone in the review except of course with black paint.

  • Very nice review.

  • Man that was a real review! Thanks a lot from a recent Spotmatic lover!

    Coincidence, but just yesterday I posted a small town review of my Spotmatic SP1000 on my small blog:

    OK, shameless plug I know but if ever anyone’s interested in how NOT to write a review…. feel free to take a look 😉

  • Nice review of a classic camera. Now while I am a die hard fan of Minolta, SrT-101 my first real camera in 1970, I did obtain a Pentax SV and Spotmatic for my collection. As luck would have it people would come into my office and see a camera display and ask me if I collect. Obviously Pentax was popular as over the years I have had three Spotmatic F and one Spotmatic SP II donated to me. All have been gone over by Eric. The only other camera I have had multiples donated to me is the Canon AE-1. Of those I only kept one and gave the others away to other film shooters starting off. The true mechanical cameras is where my heart lies.

  • I grew up around my Dad’s Spotmatic, his collection of Takumars and the Kodachrome slides he shot. He brought that camera back from from Vietnam (in one piece) along with stories and a striking collection of images. That camera will always be more than a tool. It commemorated and personalized everything from war to the most intimate childhood moments. I also learned photography with it, which has surely contributed to my passion for photography decades after I first looked through that viewfinder, cranked that winder and fired that shutter. Yes, this is a very personal attachment but I do think its a great camera. Thanks for the review (which also feels like a thorough tribute).

    • Awesome! The Honeywell-Pentax in most of the review photos was a hand-me-down from my dad. He bought it used in the 1980s for taking photography classes, and it came with a 7-element 50mm and a 135 3.5, both of which I still have. This and my FTb were two of the first SLRs I ever used.

  • I’ve owned several flavors of Spotmatic. I just didn’t take to the stop-down metering. But my first Spotmatic was a bargain buy. My most recent Spotmatic, an F, got a CLA and works like a dream. So it makes me wonder if I should send out that first Spotmatic for CLA and see if I still find the stop-down metering to be a hassle. Because oh man, those Takumar lenses are so worth it.

    • It really depends what you shoot. If you’re constantly going between sun and shade, it can be very annoying. I’ve found that the stop down meter tends to make me shoot at a faster shutter speed than I usually would just to avoid the darkening viewfinder from smaller apertures. Both of my Spotmatics are pretty early examples, so no open-aperture metering for me… Heck, the serial number on my Honeywell-Pentax starts with a 1!

  • Chris, wonderful review. Without a doubt, CP is producing the most well-written and thoughtful articles on photography out there today. I’d only add that Spotmatic’s are a great camera to buy, since they can still be repaired. Eric Hendrickson, former Pentax service manager, does a superb job in servicing almost all Pentax film cameras. He’s honest, his work is top notch and his rates are extremely reasonable. Here’s his website if anyone is interested…

    • Thank you Ned! I was having trouble with my Honeywell-Pentax a while back, and I was going to send it to Eric if my usual camera guy(Camera Works in Latham, NY) couldn’t handle it. I’ve heard nothing but great things about him.

  • An enjoyable article and as an owner of a Pentax Spotmatic with a small collection of Takumars, I mostly agree with Chris’s sentiments. But I would not place the Spotmatic’s construction quality “well beyond” that of its contemporaries, the Canon FT (and the later FTb and FTbn) or the Nikkormat FT (and the successor models FTn, FT2, and FT3). As an owner of all three models, they’re all well-made. But I’d subjectively place the Canon and Nikkormat ahead of the Pentax in terms ruggedness and fine finish. The Canon FTbn, in particular, exudes refinement. The Pentax feels a bit more delicate to the hand. That said, all three cameras seem like jewels compared to today’s appliance-like digital automatons.

    • Victor- I disagree with you, as you may have surmised. I use my FTb and Spotmatic a lot, and while the FTb certainly feels more rugged, I don’t think it feels as nicely made as either of my Spotmatics. The Spotmatic just feels tighter, and more refined, while the FTb feels more like it can take a hit.

      Of course, ruggedness and build quality are very different. Just ask any Land Rover Series I/II/III owner!

  • Great review! I tried my first Spotmatic a few years ago after years of Nikon shooting. Fell immediately in love with this wonderful camera. Now own several SPs, SPII, SPF and ES. And those Takumar lenses—WOW! I’ve written extensively about my Spotmatic love here:

    • Thanks! I’ve had mine for many years. I think I’ve only had my FTb longer. It’s a great camera, and I’ll never part with it.

      I bought a second one recently specifically because it came with an original box. It’s a sickness.

  • Very nice review. I recently found an SPII at a flea market for $30, with 50/f2 and a Vivitar zoom. After cleaning it up, I wonder if it was ever used: the shutter curtains look brand new. I was immensely impressed with the quality of the machine, and the feel of it in hand. The shutter is bang on after 144 fires at each speed to get the cobwebs out, and the meter is reasonably accurate: the battery in the camera when I bought it was still working.

    I picked up another SPII for $50 on Varagesale, just to get the 50/1.4 that was screwed onto it. I really like these cameras, and hope to find an F in good shape. Most other cameras of the time feel like you’re holding a small toolbox in comparison, size-wise.

  • Nice review. Love to see the Spotmatics get the attention they deserve. I have the regular SP and the F.

    A few corrections, though…

    The F is not the only member of the family to offer open aperture metering. The ES and ES II (electro spotmatic) does also.

    And, I never saw a K1000 with a depth of field preview…but a Spotmatic has it on the lens and the body (the switch).

  • I got my only Spotmatic I’ve ever owned in 1966. 60 years later I am still shooting it. The only difference is this: In 1966 I could only afford the f1.8 lens, although I wanted the f1.4 but could afford not only that lens but even the other Takumars which were available but not affordable for this poor salior’s budget. Today, I have almost entire stable of lenses which were available from Asahi. They are superior lenses then and they still are great lenses. Only today you can buy them for a pittance of what they cost way back then.

    And THAT is what makes them so much fun to shoot. When you shoot these oldies but goodies, the entire picture making process is entirely in your hands: speed, aperture, focus is all you adjust but after that, what’s left to play with? It’s the combination / relationship of the three that make the difference between a good and a great shot. I’m taking my Spotmatic to the grave with me (in case I get a really good shooting opportunity.)

  • A great article and so much love for the Spotmatic. I purchased mine in 1970, with a 50/1.4 and 135 super takumar lenses, together with a Pentax flash. I think it cost close on a years wages if purchased as a package in England. I purchased mine in Singapore, much cheaper but broke the bank. We are still great friends today. Without doubt, my best ever buy. A truly great and robust piece of machinery. We never tell out of love, not once!

  • I was looking on eBay and found an Asahi Pentax Spotmatic, who bought who?

  • I had a black spotmatic f camera. It´s a 1970 model. Is it the F? All i remember is how beautifull the camera was. It had the 50/1.4 and i bought a 135mm and a 35mm. I had nikon envy, got rid of the pentax and bought a nikkormat. Nikons give a very different vibe from Pentax. The spotmatic is elegant, small, light. I would never trade it for nikon these days.

  • Good article… A couple of points… The ES and ESII had open aperture metering making use of an additional pin on the late Supe-Multi-Coated and SMC Takumars. Also I don’t think the K1000 had DOF preview button. The KM and KX did. Minor points though.

  • Going to reactivate my spotmatic but must have forgotten something as I cannot see any image through the finder. What button did I forget?

  • Stefan Staudenmaier February 24, 2020 at 6:23 pm

    Left side mirror up ?

  • Actually the DOF preview on Spotmatics was part of the on/off switch for the stop down metering. The switch on the lens was the auto/manual switch for auto engaging of the aperture blades or leaving them in a set position which does work like a DOF preview, however that is not really what it is there for. The K1000 had no DOF preview at all and was more or less a replacement for the SP1000, adding a hot shoe, new mount, but removing the DOF preview and the metering switch. The KM was the true successor to the Spotmatic but was soon replaced by the more modern MX.

  • Nice review. I recently dug my old Spotmatic out of the closet, which I bought after coming home from Vietnam and shot a lot of film with over the 55 years I’ve owned it. The fun of it is its simplicity, really. I’m kind of tired of my 5 year learning process of my Canon digital Rebel. Whenever I use it I always wonder What am I missing in this shot? Too many things to play around with, so much so that the creative part of the actual shot gets forgotten about.

    The other great thing about shooting this fossil of a camera is how you can get such great glass for it for pennies on the dollar. I have a half dozen Super-Takumar lenses I simply couldn’t afford as a kid. Amazing.

    Anyway, the old Spottie is is getting a going through by a local technician and when I get it back, I’ll be going on a little safari, for sure.

  • My very first 35mm camera was a Honeywell Pentax Spotmatic, purchased in 1969 at a PX in Vietnam. I had it most of the time of my Army tour there, eventually selling it and purchasing a Bronica S2. In retrospect, the Pentax was a much more practical camera than the large and heavy Bronica. For the past 40 years, I’ve been carrying a Minolta CLE, so I do prefer compact, lightweight cameras.

  • Erica R Reinhard October 6, 2022 at 2:13 pm

    Nice review, I had one in 1972 and used it for producing slide-tape shows for school. I just got back into film photography and have assorted brands, and I recently bought a Pentax Spotmatic on eBay, nice condition and a beautifully simple camera!

  • Stefan Staudenmaier May 18, 2023 at 2:00 pm

    Simplicity is key in my Book of Photography !
    After just a while Not using 35mm Cameras any more
    I opened a Box full of some of my Pentax gear.
    First Camera I took was a Spotmatic with a Schneider Tele Xenar
    3,5/135 what a beautiful Street Photography combination !

    There is a itch now to use it again soon……very soon……

Leave a Reply

Chris Cushing

Chris Cushing is a freelance writer, pedant and photographer who still plays with cars. Based in Albany, New York, he can often be seen aimlessly wandering the Northeast with a camera twice his age slung around his neck.

All stories by:Chris Cushing