Topcon RE Super 35mm Film SLR Camera Review – The Greatest Loser

Topcon RE Super 35mm Film SLR Camera Review – The Greatest Loser

2000 1123 Josh Solomon

History, according to a popular truism, is written by the victors. And so it is in the world of cameras. Our victors? Nikon, Canon, Leica, etc. Info on those manufacturers still operating today is plentiful, and we hear of their accomplishments on any and every photography website. But what about the losers? What about the manufacturers who are long gone and forgotten by the average photo geek?

There are too many of these “losers” to name, and most of them, it’s true, lost for good reason. They didn’t offer anything special, didn’t advance the field. But there’s one long lost brand that actually was quite fantastic in its day, a company that did much to push camera tech forward, and today we’re talking about their very best camera – it’s the RE Super from Topcon.

The RE Super and the company that built it wasn’t always a forgotten relic. At one point in time it seemed the brand was destined for greatness. Tokyo Kogaku, the brand from which the Topcon name was born in much the way Nikon sprouted from Nippon Kogaku, reigned as one of the top Japanese camera and lens manufacturers. They were famous for their razor sharp Topcor lenses made in Leica Thread Mount, and for their early efforts in the Japanese SLR arena (they in fact created an SLR camera before Nikon or Canon had done so). Things went from “pretty good” to “pretty freaking fantastic” for Tokyo Kogaku when they entered a contest to see who could manufacture the official combat camera of the United States Military – and won.

Tokyo Kogaku’s winning camera was officially introduced in 1963 as the Topcon RE Super in Japan, and as the Beseler Topcon Super D in the US, as Charles Beseler Company (of enlarger fame) was established as Tokyo Kogaku’s U.S. distributor. It was quickly adopted by the U.S. Navy as their official combat camera until production finally ceased in 1971. Throughout its lifetime, the Topcon built a legendary reputation among hardcore shooters as a beautiful, bulletproof camera with lenses that could go toe-to-toe with the best from Dresden and Wetzlar.

Spend a few moments with an RE Super today, and you’ll probably agree with those old-school pros. For starters, The RE Super looks stunning and jewel-like, even among its contemporary vintage cameras. It’s got a streamlined design featuring clean, minimalistic lines, a beautiful chrome finish, and a dead-simple control layout. It’s a large and heavy camera, but it fills out its lines as beautifully as a Rolls-Royce Phantom.

And if the RE Super looks good, it feels even better. It may sound like unnecessary hyperbole, but the RE Super may just be the best-feeling 35mm camera I’ve ever used. It beats out both thread mount and M-mount Leicas, old-school Contax rangefinders, any of my Nikons, you name it. The sheer quality found on the RE Super is second-to-none, and for someone unfamiliar with the brand ’til I’d laid my hands on one, this was an extremely pleasant surprise.

Every feature of the RE Super is machined to perfection. The shutter speed dial, clicks into its detents with firm fluidity, and the ASA dial found within it spins and clicks into each ASA setting with ease. The interchangeable prism slides in and out smoothly for waist level viewing (a la the Nikon F), and the prism itself is as clean and clear as any of its competitors. Its depth-of-field preview lever is conveniently placed for left-hand operation, its shutter button depresses with one of the most perfectly weighted actions on any camera, and its film advance could embarrass both the famous Leica M and Nikon F3 advances in a smoothness contest. Hell, even the backdoor release and meter switch get their own levers flush mounted with the bottom of the camera.

And not only are these features well-machined, they’re thoughtfully placed. For example, the shutter button can be found on the front face for your middle finger to operate, leaving your index finger free to dedicate itself to the shutter speed dial. The rewind lever also spins upwards upon rewind, allowing even large hands to clear the height of the prism and avoid bumping it while rewinding. Neat.

The spec sheet is about standard for a professional SLR from the 1960s. It’s got the same-as-the-rest horizontally-traveling silk shutter capable of speeds from 1 second to 1/1000th of a second, plus bulb mode for long exposures, depth-of-field preview, a self-timer, and interchangeable focusing screens and prisms. This sounds pretty ho-hum until we get to a truly special feature of the RE Super – its light meter.

We take TTL light metering for granted these days but before the Topcon RE Super, TTL metering didn’t exist. Sure, there were on-camera light meters, but they could not see what was happening through the lens. And for the budding SLR format, a light-meter that could accurately measure the light coming through any given lens was essential. The Topcon RE Super gave us the very first TTL light meter and arguably the most influential one.

Whereas later cameras and prisms incorporated the light meter in the prism assembly, the Topcon RE Super put the light meter in the actual body of the camera, more specifically, right behind the mirror. In a stroke of genius, Topcon made a series of engravings on the mirror which let a small amount of light through to a CdS metering cell. This proved to be a massive breakthrough in light meter technology, but a breakthrough that wasn’t easily replicated. In fact, it was so hard to replicate that it took seventeen years for the technique to be executed again by Nikon’s F3. Not bad, for a camera from 1963.

The imitation doesn’t stop there either; we can find echoes of the RE Super in other cameras as well. For example, the Minolta SRT-101 places its light meter on/off switch on the bottom plate of the camera, just like the RE Super. The Nikkormat series borrows the Re Super’s light meter preview window found on the top plate. And if we’re really stretching it, one could argue that the in-body light meter of the RE Super served as inspiration for the Nikon F3’s overall design.

Incredible though the RE Super is, Topcon shooters would argue that the camera isn’t even the main attraction. No, the reason why professionals chose Topcon was for their lenses. The Topcon RE Super’s standard lenses, the RE 58mm F/1.4 and F/1.8 still stand as some of the finest standard lenses ever made for SLRs, exhibiting incredible sharpness, a subtle, lowered contrast, pastel colors, and a precise rendering of details across the frame. Topcon die-hards often claim these lenses are every bit the equal to Leica and Zeiss, and after using them, I have to agree.

Galleries in this post were made on film using Fujifilm Superia 1600.

But as with all cameras there must be compromise, and the Topcon RE Super has one – the lens mount. Topcon decided very early on to imitate the Exakta mount used on the very first Exakta SLRs. This seems like a nice quirk considering the Exakta mount looks cool and has historical significance, but there’s a fatal flaw in its design – it’s too narrow. The narrow throat of the Exakta mount prevents any lens with a huge back element (fast lenses, super wide-angle lenses, fast super wide-angle lenses) from being mounted to the camera.

What does this mean for the average shooter? If you think variety is the spice of life and you like offbeat focal lengths, the Topcon system may not be for you. Topcon’s lens roster is puny compared to other Japanese SLR systems, and most of the fun-sounding lenses are rare enough to be expensive collector’s items. That said, if you’re a traditionalist and shoot the standard focal lengths, the Topcon system is hard to beat.

Overall, the Topcon RE Super is easily one of the greatest SLRs I’ve ever had the pleasure to use. It’s simply gorgeous, extremely well-built, and every bit the camera it once was in the 1960s. But that begs the question; why did a camera as great as the Topcon RE Super fall so far off everybody’s radar? Again, we reference the old truism –  history is written by the victors.

Even though they had an incredible product, Topcon was out-marketed by crosstown rivals Nikon. The Nikon F far outstripped the RE Super in sales, especially in the blossoming U.S. enthusiast market, and in credibility due to Nikon’s masterful marketing campaigns. And to add insult to injury, the once-trailblazing Topcon mysteriously stopped innovating in the SLR realm in the 1970s (possibly due to poor sales of the RE Super) and fell quickly behind its competitors. This led to the company’s quiet and uneventful departure from photography in 1980. After that, its recession into the shadows of photographic history was unavoidable. Topcon might have won the battle, but Nikon won the war.

Today, it’s clear that the Topcon RE Super was on the wrong side of history. Almost nobody talks about Topcon save for a spattering of collectors, repairmen, and old professional shooters. But all the better for us, I say. Today, the RE Super is priced low compared to its old rival, making accessible to the average person a truly incredible camera. Will this change? Probably not. History’s already said its piece on the poor Topcon. One things for sure, though; the RE Super deserves one more shot, and a place in everybody’s camera collection.

Want your own piece of Topcon history?

Buy it on eBay

Search B&H Photo’s vintage cameras

Buy it from our own F Stop Cameras

Grab some film on Amazon

Follow Casual Photophile on Facebook and Instagram

[Some of the links in this article will direct users to our affiliates at B&H Photo, Amazon, and eBay. By purchasing anything using these links, Casual Photophile may receive a small commission at no additional charge to you. This helps Casual Photophile produce the content we produce. Many thanks for your support.]

Josh Solomon

Josh Solomon is a freelance writer and touring bassist living in Los Angeles. He has an affinity for all things analog. When not onstage, you can find him roaming around Southern California shooting film and humming a tune.

All stories by:Josh Solomon
  • Cheyenne Morrison June 30, 2017 at 9:35 am

    Great article, totally agree, the camera is highly regarded very cheap to pick up, an underrated shooter.

    The Voigtlander Bessaflex was the brainchild of Cosina’s Hirofumi Kobayashi, who based the design on the Topcon Super D of 1963, The marvellous Topcon RE-Super 58mm f/1.4 lens was so well regarded that Cosina made a limited edition of reproduction of 800 complete with the Topcon engraving.

  • I got a silver Bessaflex TM because of this fantastic look inspired by the Topcon… Never shot with a Topcon , but the Bessaflex is a great camera, 100% manual, stop down metering, speeds up to 1/2000s and M42 mount… Unfortunately the M42 mount doesn’t allow every M42 lens because of the very short distance between the rear of the lens and the mirror. I have some M42 lenses, and with some of them you only can focus up to 2-3 meters as, over that distance, the mirror is blocked by the rear of the lens 🙁 The only M42 lenses that I have and work great with the camera is the Jupiter 37A (135/f3.5, beautiful soviet 12 blades lens!!) and a Chinon Auto MC 55/1.7…
    I bought a Voigtlander Ultron SL 40/f2 as I saw some photos of the Bessaflex with this lens in various blogposts, and hoped it would work well, but again, the rear of the lens hits the mirror when focused over 3m….
    So if anyone has more detailled informations about the M42 lenses that fit well (and verified) with the Silver Bessaflex TM, I’d like to know 🙂 And the original lens that came with the Bessaflex when it was produced is very difficult to find or has a very high price…

    • I never knew about that issue with the Bessaflex. I shoot a Pentax Spotmatic, and I use an M42-mount Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4 pretty much all the time. It has a BIG rear element that protrudes well into the camera, but no interference issues.

      Does the Bessaflex have an unusually deep mirror or something?

      • Hi Chris, the mirror of the Bessaflex is kind of closer to the lens than the Spotmatic. As I have both cameras I made a comparison of the distance between the end of the lens mount and the mirror (end of the lens mount to first part of the mirror, quick measures, not high precision ones): where the spotmatic has a distance of ≈ 1.6 cm the bessaflex has ≈ 1.1 cm, so that can explain that if the rear of a lens protrudes to much (and when focusing towards infinity the rear of the lens comes more inside of the camera), it hit’s very slightly the mirror and prevents to shoot as the mirror can’t go up… But I’m really looking for M42 lenses that don’t protrude to much at infinity…

        • Ah, then you might have luck with some lenses outside the “normal” focal lengths. It seems those are the worst offenders in terms of coming past the mount in M42. I have a Super Takumar 28mm f/3.5 that barely extends past the mount at infinity, and a Super Tak 300mm f/4 which focuses using the front set of elements(the rear element is inset into the lens body and does not move). I don’t have my 35mm handy, but I don’t think that comes too far past the mount at infinity either.

  • Andrew McNamara July 1, 2017 at 6:28 am

    Topcon isn’t dead in the optical photographic industry it’s always found in medical equipment and eye examination here in the UK.

    • I was just going to say that too! My eye doctor here in the U.S. still has Super Ds in his exam rooms and uses them in his research. He says that Topcon remains very much in the medical imaging game. I have the D myself, and when I acquired it about 15 years ago, my wife and I took it’s 5.8cm f:1.8 lens out to a parade. When the prints came back, we were stunned. So I acquired more of their lenses. I also LOVE having the shutter button on the front. It feels so natural there. And yes, it is indeed the best looking and handling SLR I’ve ever used… and the only one I kept when I went digital.

  • Great review and article Josh – I never gave the Topcon line even a bit of notice. Sounds like a fun camera to shoot with.

  • I loved playing around with one of these at a Goodwill once but it was sticking and the lens was foggy and didn’t want to spend the time fixing it up. They are solidly machined and a work of art. The 58/1.4 Topcon lens was revived by Cosina in the M42 mount (and very very limited in the Nikon mount), but then also further improved upon using more modern coatings in the 58mm Voigtlander SL-iiN. It’s got a really nice rendering.

  • My ex and I had a Topcon Super D with the 58mm 1.4 lens, stolen from a softsided suitcase in checked luggage flying back from the Caribbean back in 1976 (foolish! – learned the hard way). We bought another one, only to have that one also stolen during a break-in at the home of friends we were staying with in Washington DC around 1982. We replaced that one with something much less memorable since we couldn’t find another Topcon in the days before eBay, but I still fondly recall the solid build and the mirror slap. It also had an unusual set of filters which attached to the rear of the lens – something I don’t recall seeing anywhere else.

  • After reading this article, I thought is that the old camera in the closet? Turns out I have a Topcon RE Super w/ lens, filters, and a couple of zoom lens attachments. But honestly it’s beyond me and picture taking experiences. If anyone is interested you can find me through face book.

  • I used the Topcon Super D while in the military and purchased my own when stationed in Japan. I still use my Leotax , Topcon 35L and Topcon RE Super, Super DM
    and my first SLR the Topcon R. I have managed to collect an array of lens options, all Topcor R series and Re series from 25mm f 3.5 to 500 mm f 5.6 and I do have the
    famous R series 300mm f2.8 which is a fantastic lens for wildlife photography. My Topcon cameras are still used and lenses provide excellent results when coupled with my Canon 40D giving me the best of both worlds, FILM and Digital formats. The Topcon / Canon adaptor was less than $40.00 and I get to use the great lens options made by Topcor “Tokyo Optical Company”. I visited this business while in Japan. Note: My Leotax w/ the 5cm 1.5 Simlar lens is every bit as good as my Leica IIIc 5cm f1:2 Summitar if not better. Most people have never seen a Leotax but the Leica LTM’s and M are common. The Topcor lenses are also fit directly on my Exakta cameras
    of which I have a few as well. Film is not dead like many people think and film cameras are still the best to teach photography with.

  • I am looking for a Topcon accessory: The Leica Adaptor Ring, this adaptor has the LTM 39×2 thread mount on the rear with the Topcon / Exakta bayonet mount on the
    front side. It was designed to use Topcor lenses on the Leica and Leotax (LTM) cameras. If anyone knows of one for sale please let me know.
    I do have the 42mm / bayonet adaptor which works on 42mm screw mount cameras eg; Pentax and Praktica.
    Thank you,
    David C.

  • Topcon Super D, one of the cameras I coveted when I was younger. I bought one on ebay a few years ago but had to return it because it was faulty.

  • A great story on the Topcon Super D. I bought it in Japan in 1964 and used for clinical photography (I’m a retired surgeon) for many years. Absolutely loved it! It was totally reliable, excellent quality images (especially with kodachrome film), and darn-near bullet-proof. I shelved it when I retired, but after sitting (quietly) in storage for twenty years, i recently resurrected it. After 50+ years,it still operates smoothly. Now I just need to re-learn all its features,

  • I’m old enough to remember the camera a playing around with one in a camera store back in the mid 1970’s. While I was unaware at the time of it’s selection by military as he winner against the likes of Nikon F and others, I wasn’t favorably impressed by it’s large size, long advance throw, high noise level. Handling seemed no better and possibly a little worse than other premium cameras possibly because I have small hands making the front shutter release a little problematic. It appears to me that it’s best feature was the built-in TTL meter and it’s ability to function regardless of accessory finder, something that eluded Nikon until the early 80’s with the F3 or mid 70’s with the Canon F-1. I found a fairly thorough review from Popular Photography (1969) confirming rather high levels of noise and vibration. The 6 vs 8 tooth sprocket design contributed to it’s long 180 degree advance throw. While bokeh was not discussed back then, the 58/1.4 bench testing was a little disappointing and exhibited enough focus shift where refocus stopped down at the shooting aperture was recommended for really critical sharpness. That said, I ultimately defer to those who actually used the camera in the field as it seems to be quite popular among it’s fans.

    • Topon certainly made the loudest camera ever. The Topcon Auto 100 was the camera my dad used all through my formative years. In fact the fist camera I made a photo with or a snowman! ClaaCKCLUNK!!!

  • I’ve never even seen a Topcon RE Super, but it occurred to me that this is one of the few that the meter display wouldn’t disappear in stop down metering as it is not lit by the light through the lens. It seems to be lit through the top plate window.

  • Sadly Topcon sĺr in Vietnam, heavy but reliable had 25mm 35mm 50mm 1.4 the zoom I think was bc about 70to 200 a 135 and the macro lens upgraded to ‘re super dm when he winder came out and used the 250 exp back and motor drive on a second body. Topcon built their equipment like a c tank and all but indistructable. I graduated to Blad 500CM as a lot of my work was fashion and portraiture. When I started using 35mm in the late 70’s writing waa on the wall and I gradually moved to Nikon

  • The etched lines on the mirror result in two problems: it darkens the screen slightly, but more critically, the lines show up whenever you stop down to check depth-of-field or use a small aperture lens. Very annoying. Hard to check focus when looking through what feels like a wire cyclone fence. I found the camera heavy and hard to hold, but others with bigger hands may disagree on that point. The Exakta mount is definitely a restriction. Topcon tried to move away from it with its leaf-shutter SLRs but none were a success.

  • Topcon , Tokyo Kogaku, invented and patented the thru the mirror light meter . I chose the Topcon Super D over the Nixon F in 1967 because of it and the best sharpness of its lenses . This camera performed perfectly for some 30 years ( I still have it safely kept to pass on as a collectible to my son) . It was totally modular built and I was able to use its accessory modules as : 3 fps electric trigger with rechargeable battery grip, radio remote control trigger, 6x magnifying viewfinder , telescope and microscope adapters, 100 frames bulk film cartridge back , and its superb 1:1 macro lenses . It’s 25 mm and 85 mm lenses were fantastic, specially the later for portraiture.
    None other camera could claim as the Topcon SuperD to be the forerunner and best designed/ built of the SLR’s that followed.

  • I used a Topcon Super Dm for years from 1982 and loved it. Lens super-sharp F1.4. Apparently the Super Dm was the first camera with an autowinder. An article and real world test on the fabled ‘R’ lenses would be welcome: 85 f1.8 135 f2 and 300 f2.8. As good as the Super D and RE are I have seen no explanation of the marketing decision to make these ridiculous specification lenses in 1962-65: these were all produced pre-RE mount. Certainly the brand was unadvertised by the 80s. Watch out for the dirt cheap Wink UV lenses. No adapter made so far for these
    Seems that from 62-67 Tokyo Kogaku really tried to give Nikon a run for their money. Build quality was all there. Lenses were superior. Marketing was sporadic. I wonder if the US Navy saw the lenses and cold weather usability the key. Nikon and Canons had to be winterised for low temperatures: in a WCW test in 1981(??) Kester Cranswick remarked that the shutter would fire at well below 0 without modification.

    • Has anyone on this planet seen a RE super Topcon with a US Navy marking on its baseplate? I thought on the Beseler Super D was the only US Navy contracted item? Let me know, thanks Don

  • Through mirror metering came to other brands before 13 years was up, the Miranda Sensorex released in 1966 featured it, combined with open aperture metering.

Leave a Reply

Josh Solomon

Josh Solomon is a freelance writer and touring bassist living in Los Angeles. He has an affinity for all things analog. When not onstage, you can find him roaming around Southern California shooting film and humming a tune.

All stories by:Josh Solomon