A Better Look at Konica

A Better Look at Konica

1511 850 Dario Veréb

I spend a lot of time at thrift stores, usually in search of records, clothes or cameras. I can browse through the music department for hours, try on jacket after jacket just to put them all back, and scan the electronics section for anything camera-shaped in seconds. Hitting up these stores is such a fun Saturday activity, and gladly my girlfriend enjoys it as much as I do. 

If you are at these venues as often as I am, you will eventually start to notice which products are more likely to fly off the shelves. Brand clothing and 1980s records are top sellers. Point-and-shoot and foldable cameras do not sit for long, either. But certain things are real shelf warmers: Konica cameras, for example. Like brightly colored 5XL suits and Swiss folk music CDs, Konicas don’t get a lot of love. Outside of the thrift shop, among the blogosphere and on camera culture YouTube channels, Konica seems a bit overlooked. 

As a result of this tepid enthusiasm (and my own innate curiosity), I’ve always been left wondering what hides behind the brand. So, I did some research. 

A Very Brief History of Konica

Konica’s history dates back to 1873, making the company older than Kodak. At that time, the pharmacist Rokusaburo Sugiura started to sell photographic and lithographic products in his store called “Konishi-ya” based in Tokyo. After passing the business on to his younger brother, he founded a new venture to design and build a camera. This new business was called “Konishi Honten.” 

While photography had started to gain popularity in the 1890s, many people where still hesitant to use wet plate cameras. Dry plate cameras, on the other hand, made photography more accessible. And it’s this type of camera which Suguira’s company would develop first. 

Konishi Honten’s first camera was called the Cherry. It debuted in 1903 and sold for about 2 Yen. It appealed to the Japanese masses thanks to its simplicity and low price. Although the name below the lens was written in Latin letters, the product was never intended to be marketed internationally. This decision was likely made because international competition was just too numerous – Sugiura had patterned the Cherry after the British “Little Nipper” which was already a copy of a French camera called “the Gnome” – yes, the market for dry plate box cameras was pretty saturated. In Japan, however, the Cherry sold strong enough that Konishi Honten soon became the country’s leading camera maker. [Editor’s Note – no surviving examples of the original Cherry are known to exist in the world today.]

The first Cherry was followed by a second and a third version, which were manufactured and sold until about 1920. Shortly thereafter, while still holding the lead position for Japanese camera makers, Rokusaburo Sugiura’s eldest son took over management and changed the company’s name to “Konishiroku Honten.” 

The company would go on to release the first Japanese-made color film called “Sakura Natural Color Film” in 1940 and follow up with the original “Konica” camera in 1946. Interestingly, it wasn’t until 1987 that the company officially decided to change its name to “Konica.” 

For decades, Konica was the fourth largest film manufacturer in the world, behind Kodak, Fuji and Agfa. But in the end, it suffered the same fate as Miranda, Petri and Topcon. The company floundered as sales of single-lens reflex cameras declined dramatically in the 1980s (in favor of compact electronic point-and-shoots largely made by other Japanese brands). Konica eventually ceased production of its SLR systems and finally withdrew from the SLR market entirely in 1987. 

Konica’s point-and-shoot cameras stood little chance against their competitors, especially in Europe, even though many are of pretty good quality. Not long after ending their SLR production, a decision had to be made. In a last attempt to save themselves from going out of business, Konica merged with Minolta in 2003. But this only delayed the inevitable. On January 19, 2006, Konica-Minolta announced its intention to withdraw from the photographic business. The total withdrawal was completed by the end of the same year. Konica’s film business was abandoned and the camera division sold to Sony. While the recipes of Minolta lenses continued to be incorporated into new Sony lenses, Konica’s centuries-old name (and expertise) has vanished. 

Konica’s Legacy Today

Today, as film photography and film gear reaches popularity not known since Konica’s heydey, the brand’s products are often overlooked. But while the products of its hundred years of manufacturing are overshadowed by more popular competitors, Konica hasn’t entirely faded from memory. A handful of their cameras have regained some popularity in the 21st century – the Recorder, the Tomato and Pop, the Big Mini, and the Hexar RF. But there are many more excellent and important Konica cameras and lenses that have simply been forgotten.

There’s Konica’s very first SLR, the quite rare Konica F, which was also the first 35mm SLR in the world to achieve a shutter speed of 1/2000 of a second. It is the only Konica with interchangeable viewfinders and was introduced with some serious glass worth collecting. Then there is the more popular Konica Auto-Reflex, which was one of the first 35mm SLR cameras with an automatic exposure control. It is a very standard SLR but also a pretty reliable one. Its successors can be had dirt cheap and are pretty good companions for anyone looking to start their film photography journey (Jeb touched on this in his review of the T3, and the 40mm Hexanon lens which often comes attached). The FS-1 was the first 35mm SLR with a built-in motor for film advance. It set the trend for all other cameras after it. And Konica even made the first production autofocus camera, the Konica C35 AF. 

Konica was a true brand of firsts, but somehow the name gets little to no recognition for it today. And we’ve only talked about the cameras so far. The story’s the same for Konica’s lenses.

Oftentimes the Konica lenses we encounter at flea markets or thrift stores have been stored horribly, and they suffer fungus or damage. That is why they are regularly overlooked. But knowing about the demands the Japanese have towards their technology and manufacturing, you should definitely reconsider the brand’s lenses if you find one in good condition. 

The AR-mount lenses produced from 1965 come in four variations. The first version distinguishes itself through a silver collar between aperture and focusing ring. It is probably the most sought after, although the second and third versions look sleeker in their all black appearance. The two successor versions differ optically through their focus ring, which in later lenses is no longer completely made of metal, but covered with rubber instead. The automatic aperture control on version one and two is indicated with the orange letters “EE” standing for “Electric Eye”. In the latest version, the markings are very similar to those on Canon’s FD lenses. The mark is now green and says “AE” for “Automatic Exposure”. We could go into much more detail here but for anyone looking to build a full film camera kit, this information should be enough to start digging. If the glass elements or blades look dirty: do not worry. These lenses feature no electrical components and disassembling them is easy enough. Just make sure you have the right tools. If you give Konica lenses the love they deserve, they will quickly regain the beauty that once made them so popular.

If They’re So Good, Then Why Are They Dead?

Don’t sleep on Konica or other obscure Japanese camera companies just because they’re no longer around. Competition in the Japanese photographic technology industry was (and remains) unbelievably fierce, and many companies died even though they had impressive products and potent designs (even Olympus recently called it quits). The likes of Miranda, Petri, Topcon, Minolta should not be discounted out of hand. These and others made countless contributions to the field of photography through smart engineering and innovative technologies. What’s more, each of these brands has a history that’s as interesting as any other, once we do a little research. 

Take Topcon for example. This lesser-known Japanese camera-maker emerged from the measure instruments section of Seikosha, the predecessor to Seiko, and was a photographic supplier to both the Japanese Army and the United States Navy. Their flagship, the Topcon RE was the first camera in the world to offer a through-the-lens exposure meter. Josh wrote a review of the RE Super which reinforces many of the points I’ve made here about Konica. CP editor James, about the Topcon, wrote this – “The RE Super is one of the finest-made mechanical cameras of its era. It’s a beautiful machine, impressively over-built, and I think it should get more credit in classic camera-liking circles.” 

We admire and covet cameras and lenses from Nikon, Canon, Olympus or Pentax  because their quality and versatility are world-class. The equivalent products from these less-lauded brands are easily their equal. You simply need a bit more research to find these gems. So the next time you see a Konica lens or camera on the shelf of your local thrift store, take a look at it and check the price tag. Is that not one hell of a bargain? I bet it is. And now excuse me, I have to go thrifting! 

Browse eBay for Konica cameras here

Browse for Konica cameras in our shop, F Stop Cameras 

Follow Casual Photophile on Facebook and Instagram

[Some of the links in this article will direct users to our affiliates at B&H Photo, Amazon, and eBay. By purchasing anything using these links, Casual Photophile may receive a small commission at no additional charge to you. This helps Casual Photophile produce the content we produce. Many thanks for your support.]

Dario Veréb

Dario Veréb is a photographer and journalist from Zurich, Switzerland. After having shot extensively with an Olympus Mju II Zoom 80 in his childhood he rediscovered his love for film photography when he stumbled across an Olympus OM-1 in his hometown. He has not found a cure for his GAS (gear acquisition syndrome) since and is often found roaming flea markets and thrift stores in search of cheap point and shoots and all things Japanese.

All stories by:Dario Veréb
  • The Konica Auto S-2 has been on my wish list for a long time but always seems to get nudged aside by another Minolta.

  • In my collection I have a C35 FD. I do not use. I should have a Konica Hexar.
    I believe some wonderful brands such Olympus, Minolta, Contax, Konica, Rollei, … was too good for consumers who are brain washed by marketing which is the great success of Sony Alpha cameras (I have one … sorry, I use less and less, in fact the camera I use the most is my M3 😉 ) The pleasure I can have with film cameras I cannot have with digital one’s.

  • JEAN-CLAUDE HARDT March 30, 2021 at 5:32 am

    In the 1980’s-1990’s I was often asked to make wedding-photos for my friends and family, and I often used Konica-Films (VX100 and VX200), because of their natural colours, admired by every wedding couple…the Konica Autoreflex T3 was long time on my wishlist to replace my Praktica L, but I bought a Minolta XD-5 in 1981, because of the more popular bayonet to interchange lenses and accessories with other members of our photoclub at that time…my Minolta is still in use, and reliable after 40 years!

  • I started photographing with a used Sony A7 and an adapted Konica AR 50 1.7, which I would argue is the best lens you can find for $20. I also enjoy how poetic the pair is, since Konica was acquired by Minolta which was later acquired by Sony.

  • Konica-Minolta lives on as a manufacturer of delicate and temperamental photocopiers. Seriously, if I can copy, staple, and punch a stack of 30 assignments for my students without having to unjam something or get the admin assistant to call the tech people, it’s a miracle. Still, I get a little pang of nostalgia looking at that logo on the front of the machine as I try to ascertain what this or that infernal beeping alarm means.

  • I’m first a Minolta fan, have shot them since 1972 and have a large collection. When I started collecting other makes back in 1999 I made the decision to avoid Canon and Nikon at the time. Bullies on the block so to speak. I set my sights on the underdogs of Yashica, Konica, Ricoh, Topcon and Miranda which few wanted. Consequently I was able to amass a large selection of them, and their lenses, all for very little back then. Konicas S1.6, S2, and their many Autoreflex SLRs are some that see very few reviews. I finally acquired a S1.6, after many years looking and waiting, and have put it back into very nice working condition. Great rangefinder with it’s Hexanon f1.6 lens.

  • Dario, thanks for putting to print what I’ve felt for a long time. Konica does not get its due.

    I own 10 Konicas (8 SLR, 2 RF) and they are some of the most used cameras in my collection, especially my T3n’s.

    The Autoreflex TC is criminally overlooked and is a great alternative to the AE-1, especially since it is only battery dependent for metering and autoexposure. I use two 675 hearing aid batteries and #7 O-rings in it and my exposures are dead-on. I’ve regularly come across TC’s with a 50mm f1.7 for less than $50, half of what an AE-1 body is going for these days.

  • Cheyenne Morrison March 30, 2021 at 6:12 pm

    I did a full history of the company to add to my review of my Konishiroku Pearl IV from 1959. There is a marker in the main park in Shinjuku Tokyo showing the location of the factory where Japan’s first camera was produced; kind of cool that the literal birthplace of the Japanese camera industry exists. I had planned visiting it with Bellamy Hunt when I was supposed to go to Tokyo last April, but Covid put that plan to waste 🙁

    Birthplace of Photography Industry, Shinjuku Central park

    Location Coordinates: 35°41’22.1″N 139°41’21.3″E
    35.689472, 139.689250

  • I got some Konica 100 and 400 speed film in my freezer waiting to be used.
    I have also scanned some Sakura slides from the 1970s for a school I teach at.

  • One thing which lets down the Konica Autoreflex SLR range is their choice of battery, as they need either 675 or 625 mercury cells. To be fair they only loose light metering without the battery but still.

    I might pick my T4 over earlier Minolta XG cameras, but would put it down for any Nikon FM or FE.

  • The Konica IIs and IIIs are excellent rangefinders as well. I’m wondering what happened to the machinery of Konica’s film division after it was purchased by paper giant Dai Nippon Printing. Is the whole kit in a warehouse somewhere, or was it sold as scrap after 2006?

  • Great article! I believe the first version of the “auto-reflex” had the ability to switch into half frame mid-roll! But my knowledge of konica isn’t all that great. I just figured that’s a fun tidbit to add.

  • Interesting read, thanks! Even though the brand is gone, they kind of live on in Sony’s system. The “alpha” brand was used by Konica Minolta before they sold the business unit to Sony and you can even use Minolta A lenses with autofocus on Sony’s mirrorless alpha cameras.

    • Kevin Eyewanders April 28, 2021 at 10:59 pm

      Unfortunately that is almost entirely Minolta DNA found in Sony. Konica legacy has evaporated into the ether.

  • I pulled a Konica Hexar 38mm f2.8 lens from an irreparably damaged C35 AF, and 3D printed a new housing to use on my Sony full frame mirrorless. It’s not great at f/2.8, but it’s absolutely tiny! I need to print a smaller aperture and see how it sharpens up. The whole package would be in the running for the lightest possible functional full-frame lens.

  • A less know, but great site (using google translate) about Konica:


  • GARY A. GALARRITA April 11, 2021 at 9:32 pm

    Hi, very good article. I got a Konica IIBm Rangefinder.

  • 9 SLR bodies and 28 hexanon lenses spanning 21mm to 200mm probably tells you I am a massive Konica fan. My Cosina made Konica TC-X was manufactured in March 1989 making it one of the last SLRs to wear the Konica badge. It’s very plastic but due to the time of production I’ll never sell it. The author of the ‘Konica files’ website has never seen or heard of a newer one.

  • Kevin Eyewanders April 28, 2021 at 10:56 pm

    AMEN, brother. This all needed and needs still to be said again and again. The most “sought after” cameras and glass are always those that are from the brands we recognize from TODAY’S market, even when quite often those older offerings were subpar when pitted against the direct competition of the time, from the likes of Konica and Topcon, as you’ve described.

    The more I have shot Konica in the past near-decade the more Konica I have aquired and the less I shoot my other gear. It’s that’s good.

  • Bought a tidy EEmatic in a junk shop because it looked like a piece of quality engineering, without holding much hope for the selenium cell. A couple of judicial taps and the metering came to life, compared to Minolta srts, Yashica FR, Olly RC this little beast will have the most accurate metering per film exposed. And the lense is a cracker, I feed this one the good films.
    It`s like a bigger, better built Olly XA 1 but it doesn`t underexpose the way they could.
    Don`t know how it happened but film cameras seem to be breeding in dark corners around here, if I only had this and a Minolta SRT Super I`d be happy.

  • Konica was not aquired by Minolta. It’s the other way around, even though it is often called a merger. It wasn’t.

  • Kevin Eyewanders April 18, 2022 at 1:54 am

    Konica and Topcor glass were top-of-the-class in their day. Some of the best you can find. Get them (and their camera relatives) while you still affordably can.

  • Just bought a Konica Pearl III, the IV is too expensive for me. I had one shortly a Koniflex TLR, but it wasn’t in great condition so I bought it soon, since I have already a Minolta Autocord. I have mostly Minolta gear…
    Beside the Pearl IV, a few other Konica are not exactly cheap, e.g. the Hexar RF, the IIIM, the Recorder (half frame). The early SLR with mid-roll switch to halfframe sounds also fun, not sure if this is expensive or just rare (and of course, for a half frame a full frame SLR is a bit large and one of the real halfframes might make more sense…)

    I am thinking right now if I should buy a IIIa, or a later Konica rangefinder like the Auto S1.6 or the SE, the S3 would be too similar to my Minolta himatic 7sII… Maybe also a Konica EYE halfframe, adding to my Canon Demi EE17..

    • I personally love the Konica III and similar simple rangefinder models, and prefer them over the later Autos. The earlier cameras seem to be more reliable, anecdotally speaking.

      The Recorder is also on my list, if only due to its quirky design. Good luck!

Leave a Reply

Dario Veréb

Dario Veréb is a photographer and journalist from Zurich, Switzerland. After having shot extensively with an Olympus Mju II Zoom 80 in his childhood he rediscovered his love for film photography when he stumbled across an Olympus OM-1 in his hometown. He has not found a cure for his GAS (gear acquisition syndrome) since and is often found roaming flea markets and thrift stores in search of cheap point and shoots and all things Japanese.

All stories by:Dario Veréb