Reviewing My Time with the Konica Hexar RF

Reviewing My Time with the Konica Hexar RF

2000 1125 Drew Chambers

The best M mount camera ever made was the Konica Hexar RF. Now that I have your attention, allow me to walk that claim back a bit. We can haggle about what the “best” M mount camera is, but what’s undeniable is that the Konica Hexar RF is the most powerful M mount camera there is. And I got rid of it so I could buy a watch.

What follows is a brief story of why the Hexar found its way into my life and how it found its way out of my life. 

The Rangefinder Mystique

No sooner does a person enter the film photography community today than they are confronted by the cult of the rangefinder. Point and shoots are maligned as a fashion accessory, and SLRs are a dime a dozen, but the rangefinder occupies that upper echelon of 35mm gear. The mythos of rangefinders snakes its way through social media with tales of better lenses and famous photographers. 

Much of the talk is true, of course. Rangefinders don’t have a mirror, which, in turn, results in a smaller flange-to-film distance, quieter shooting, and steadier shooting. Rangefinders, by definition, use a rangefinder viewfinder without any sort of prism meaning lenses can stay stopped down while composing, there’s no viewfinder darkening as a result of slow lenses or filters, and the viewfinder coverage extends beyond what the lens sees. 

The flange-to-film distance and the stopped-down composing allows rangefinder lenses to be smaller and, in some cases, optically superior to SLR lenses. This is because there is no need to either clear the mirror (which means lens elements can extend further into the camera body) or house components for automatic stop-down. So on and so forth.

For me, part of the reason I so pined for a rangefinder was that mystique. Anyone and everyone can find an old Canon or Pentax SLR, but only so many walk around with a rangefinder in its svelte form factor. 

The Canonet 28 scratched that itch early on for me, but after some time, I knew only an M mount camera would do. I started with a Leica CL, which lasted only a few weeks. Next I owned a Voigtlander Bessa R2 in olive green. The Bessa was fun and gorgeous, but ultimately felt cheap in my hands: it was constructed out of magnesium (a low density metal), the exposure indicators flickered in the viewfinder, the shutter release had too little resistance. 

I was faced with a crisis of faith. I praised rangefinders as demigods but my affordable M mount bodies were lackluster. Was the issue the rangefinder or my budget? Having ditched the CL and the Bessa, I thought I’d add in another constraint: aperture-priority.

I laid my options out on a mental table: the Minolta CLE, the Konica Hexar RF, a couple Voigtlander Bessa models, the Zeiss Ikon, and, of course, the Leica M7. The Voigtlanders were out. The Ikon was out here pulling costs over two grand, while the M7 was even greater than that. Left with the CLE and the Hexar, my choice was easy. 

Choosing the Hexar

In all the cameras I’ve loved and lost, only two, in retrospect, broke my heart: the Contax G1 and the Contax 167MT. The former left my collection due to its spotty autofocus, to be replaced by the formidable Fujifilm GA645. The latter left my collection in my pursuit of a rangefinder. 

The reason why my choice between the CLE and Hexar was easy comes down to my love for the G1. Internet-hearsay suggests that the Konica Hexar RF was manufactured by the same manufacturer responsible for the Contax G1 and Contax G2, as well as the Hasselblad XPan. I can’t say with any certainty how true this is, but the cameras themselves certainly seem to confirm it. 

From the matte powder coating to the knobs and switches to even the back cover release, the resemblances are striking. Couple these body similarities with Zeiss’s Planar 50mm f/2 ZM lens and you get pretty close to a manual focus Contax G1. Hence, my choice was an easy one.

I kissed goodbye the Bessa R2, and a few weeks later I met another hobbyist at a Dunkin Donuts in Canton, Massachusetts to test and then leave with a beautiful Hexar RF. 

Before getting down to the brass tacks, let me address one of the two most common disparages of the Hexar (the other being its reliance on electronics): “It’s not really an M mount camera! It’s a KM mount camera!” This debate has raged on the web since the earliest days of turn-of-the-century forums and messaging boards. 

I can’t definitively say that the KM mount is or is not the same as the Leica M mount. I can say that I have used multiple M mount lenses on my Hexar including at f-stops as large as 1.4 and never has my focus been off. I am but one of many, many film shooters who has never had a problem shooting M mount lenses on their KM camera. 

The Brass Tacks

The Konica Hexar RF is a rangefinder film camera for the modern era. Let me quickly point out its defining modern features: 

  • Internal motordrive (i.e., automatic film advance) 
  • Easy film loading with the motordrive 
  • Automatic film rewind
  • Capable of 2.5 frames per second on continuous shooting
  • 1/4000th of a second maximum shutter speed
  • Auto exposure mode with a speed range of 16 seconds to 1/4000th of a second
  • Auto exposure lock mode (lock with a half-depress of the shutter release button) 
  • Exposure compensation from -2 to +2 in 1/3rd of a stop increments
  • 1/125th of a second flash sync
  • Self-timer
  • DX ISO setting
  • Metal shutter

These features come packed inside an aluminum chassis with titanium top and bottom plates and a textured rubber cover on the front and back, weighing in at 560 grams. On the front of the camera, you’ll find an incorporated right-side grip in the form of a modest crag for your fingers to hold. Moving left from the grip, there’s a small lens lock release button in silver with a concentric red circle. Left further still, there’s a small lever for changing which framelines appear in the viewfinder, overriding the default framelines set by the lens. 

(The frameline lever features a three-textured design: a dimpled metal, a matte metal like the body, and a high gloss metal. Of course, this design is irrelevant to the camera’s use or even general appearance, but the decision to design one tiny part with three textures speaks to Konica’s commitment to the details.) 

Above that lever, you’ll find the viewfinder glass: big, multi-coated, and gorgeous. The viewfinder has framelines for the following lens lengths: ​​28mm + 90mm, 50mm + 75mm, 35mm + 135mm, in those combinations (meaning that when a 28mm lens is on the camera, both the 28mm and the 90mm framelines will show up). The magnification is admittedly only 0.6x, which is far from real life. Resultantly, the framelines are good for wide lenses and pretty small for long lenses. In general, I find the viewfinder to be plenty bright and very clear. 

Getting to the top plate, there’s an LCD output that shows, at all times, the battery level and, when turned on, the current frame number. There’s a hotshoe, an exposure compensation dial housing a manual ISO wheel, the shutter speed dial (which locks at “AE” and “AEL,” both painted green) with a red “125,” and the on-off switch that is straight stolen from the Contax G cameras. 

The rest of the camera’s external features are relatively straightforward—manual rewind button, tripod socket, mechanical shutter release, battery compartment, silver-plated brass lugs on the top front, the aforementioned door release switch. These are in addition to my favorite tiny feature, the film door preview. A small, clear, pill-shaped window allows the camera’s user to see if and what film is loaded in the camera. 

Maybe the most standard aspect of the Hexar is its meter, a center-weighted TTL silicon photodiode and no TTL flash metering. Would I prefer evaluative metering and/or the option to choose spot metering? Undoubtedly. Did the Hexar ever botch the exposure in my time with it? Not in my judgment. 

What you get in the Konica Hexar RF is a blazingly fast automatic camera with manual focusing. 

The Hexar Experience

Shooting with the Hexar can best be described as sexy. A sleek, all black camera with a satisfying shutter snap and futuristic “zh-ghzt” film advance sound, the shooting experience is just cool. (And yes, I did spend about five minutes listening to the advance sound, imitating it myself, and trying to put it into letters). 

The Konica Hexar accompanied me on hikes, a wedding, an anniversary getaway to Walden Pond, walks in Manhattan, night jaunts on the Ocean City boardwalk, and quotidian tasks throughout the 21 months I owned it. 

Focusing was easy for me, the camera was hefty in my hands (a plus for me), and produced well-metered photos at the click of a button. Does it feel like a Contax G1 as I might have hoped? Not exactly, but it’s also a far cry from the clunky manualness of the Leica CL or the clickety flimsiness of the Bessa R2. 

For me, it was a Goldilocks 35mm experience–just automatic enough to be easy while still feeling engrossed in the process. Of course, the host of M-mount lenses play a big part in that experience. Perhaps my favorite lens to keep on the Hexar was my 35mm f/2.8 Zeiss Biogon. The f/2.8 is the slimmest of the ZM Biogon lenses but remains to be of the utmost build quality. 

Many favorite photos of mine were taken with the Hexar, but as I write this, the camera has found its way into the home of another hobbyist film photographer. Why so? 

Leaving the Hexar Behind

Two predominant factors led to the Hexar’s exit from my camera collection. The first was the introduction of a Pentax camera, and the second was a renewed fervor for watch collecting. This article is not a review of either the Pentax or any watch, but I’ll briefly explain the impact of each.

Having heard of the illustrious qualities of the Limited lenses produced by Pentax in the late ‘90s, I decided to search out a pristine copy of the 43mm f/1.9. Given the lens is autofocus, I decided it needed to be paired with an AF camera. I landed on the Pentax ZX-5N/MZ-5N after dismissing the MZ-S on account of it being damn ugly and too big and too digital. Long story short, I adore this combination and it quickly became my preferred camera and lens. 

Now in August 2020–five months after acquiring my Hexar RF–I found myself with a revitalized interest in mechanical watches. In earlier years, I had been content with a Seiko SKX013 and a vintage Mido Commander President Daydate. Both were solid watches, but the Seiko was no longer exciting to me and the Mido was just a bit too far on the vintage side of things. Another long story short, in September I acquired a NOMOS Club Campus Night after selling all of my other watches and some camera gear. 

By August 2021, I found myself compelled to somehow get my hands on an Oris Aquis Date. I had tried the watch on in 2020, but never pulled the trigger. Looking at my poor Hexar RF sitting on the shelf having not been used since June and continually losing out to the Pentax when times came to grab a camera as I headed out the door, I decided it would have to be sacrificed on the watch alter. 

So out went the Hexar and in came a beautiful Oris Aquis Date 39.5 with the so-called Mint Green dial. I have to say, as much as it pains me to say this in a Casual Photophile article, that I do not regret the swap. I suppose, after all, I really am just a casual photophile. 

Concluding Thoughts

My camera collection is at present the smallest it’s been in years. I have just four film cameras: my Pentax ZX-5N, my Olympus Pen FT, my Fujifilm GA645, and my Hasselblad 501c. Coincidentally, as my camera collection has dwindled, my watch collection has swelled. 

Part of the fun of being a casual photophile is trying lots of cameras for the heck of it. And tried many I have! But another satisfying realization for me in the past year and a half has been refining my sense of what I really want in a camera and being satisfied with that preference.

It turns out I really like SLRs and I really like small cameras. The Pentax ended up being the camera for me, and now I get to shoot it with a watch I adore around my wrist. Luckily, the Hexar is in the capable hands of Kirk, a photographer from Pennsylvania. Maybe it will be the camera for him–or maybe he’ll swap it with something he loves more. 

Shop for your own Konica Hexar RF on eBay here

Find a camera at our store, F Stop Cameras


Follow Casual Photophile on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram

[Some of the links in this article will direct users to our affiliates at B&H PhotoAmazon, and eBay. By purchasing anything using these links, Casual Photophile may receive a small commission at no additional charge to you. This helps Casual Photophile produce the content we produce. Many thanks for your support.]

Drew Chambers

Drew Chambers is a former high school teacher and current master's student at Harvard University. He lives in Waltham, Massachusetts with his wife and their perfect dog. Outside of teaching, reading, and writing, Drew spends most of his time listening to indie rock. He is happy when photographing.

All stories by:Drew Chambers
20 comments
  • Like every time here:
    – Great photographer,
    – Great images,
    – Great kit,
    – Great review,
    😉 what else : nothing negative.
    Thank to remember again that the KONICA Hexar RF is a great RF, considering we have nearly used the same cameras.
    I love the images.
    Thank you for your work and your time: excellent.

  • Great reading and great pictures! Is there a typo in “I landed on the Pentax ZX-5N/MZ-5N after dismissing the MZ-5 on account of it being damn ugly and too big and too digital.” I guess you refer to the MZ-S not the MZ-5. Wish you luck with the MZ-5-N. I had two and both died from the failing mirror motor syndrome. They all seem to end like that…

    • Great read Drew, thank you.

      Wonderful to know that in the great Venn diagram of life that I’m not the only one in the overlap between cameras and watches (I’m sure there are lots of us).

      I’ve been struggling to fall in love with an M6 I bought 2 years ago, maybe it’s time to sell it and give a Hexar RF a try.

      • So it’s now April, and not long after reading the post I found a Hexar RF and sold my M6 … I’m so much happier and using it a lot more than I did with my M6: the extra 2 stops of speed makes a huge difference for someone who likes to shoot wide open, and I really like its’ AEL. Auto wind/rewind is nice, maybe not necessary, but the loading process is so much easier than Leica’s.

        A great camera.

  • Drew-I really enjoyed reading this, and got the same sense of varying hobby enthusiasm that many of are experiencing. Enjoy the new lens and the watches!

    Although this was more about why you got rid of the Hexar, I feel like at least a mention of the Pentax ZX-5n’s reliability would have been a good addition. I was not familiar with the model, and when I pulled it up on eBay, there were 8 for sale, everyone of which was listed as “for parts/not working”. I hope you have better luck with it than those folks.

  • Brilliant and so we’ll said – I’m currently selling mine in the UK! I have loved it, and your review is absolutely spot-on. But too many film cameras, and my ❤️ is in medium format. For those interested…

    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Konica-Hexar-RF-35mm-Rangefinder-Film-Camera-Leica-M-Lens-UK-sale-/203733994683?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&_trksid=p2349624.m46890.l6249&mkrid=710-127635-2958-0

  • My experience of the RF was that there was a delay between hitting the shutter and it actually firing. Was this something you ever encountered? Made it very difficult to use and why I got rid of mine.

  • Fun to read. We “need” a lot of Cameras, but than… Remembers me on my hunt for the best Point&Shoot AF Camera. Saw a lot Reviews, read a lot Articles, compared many Candidates by their stats. At the End, i was an Expert 😀 (in my $-Range), but didnt need one and sold it after a Year for a decent Lens for my SLR.

  • Love the pictures. Every time I read a new review I want to buy a new camera.

  • I’d love an M mount film camera with a 1/4000 sec shutter, but all the stories – real and imagined – of the error codes appearing on these Konicas with no possibility of repair has scared me off.
    Great pics.

  • You didn’t say why the Leica CL “lasted only a few weeks”. Was it the “clunky manualness”?

  • The Minolta CLE was fantastic when new. But these are going on 4 decades old, a bit of a risk for a device completely reliant on early vintage electronics. I wonder how many still work?

    • Mine still works. But I am aware that at any time it might not. Great little camera.

    • I bought my CLE about 10 years ago, for a lot less money than it`s going for now. It served me well and it was always my favourite camera, even more than the various Leica Ms I had, because of the compactness and auto exposure. I even managed to find a repair technician in Germany to give it a pricey service after some exposure problems.

      A few days ago, when I took it for a walk in the snow, the LEDs in the viewfinder started jumping around – a common issue. I hope that’s not definitely the end of the journey, but it will be hard to use from now on. The best thing to do is to enjoy these cameras as they last – but I wouldn’t spend any serious money on it.

      • That’s true, unfortunately. I own some solid, fully mechanical gear from the 1950s that can be fixed by competent technicians. On the other hand, I tend to mistrust 1980s electronics: usually, when the electronics start behaving in unexpected ways, it means your camera is going the way of the Dodo.

  • Hi Drew,

    That’s a compelling lens that started your move away from the Hexar. I picked up a 43mm Limited around 6 months ago and it had not come off the front of my MZ-S until my 77mm Limited arrived the other day.

    I do feel like I should put in a plug for the MZ-S, here. I worked in a camera shop back in 2001 when that camera came out. We took a look at the sales literature, shrugged, and went on “debating” about how I was the only Pentax shooter in the shop. A customer had us special order one for him, when it arrived we asked if he’d mind unboxing it in the shop so that we could lay eyes on it. Once more we shrugged, wondered, “what are they thinking?”, and went on our merry way.

    Almost two years ago, that camera came back into my mind. Shortly after, I saw one for sale, inexplicably bought it, and waited for FedEx to show. It took me about 7 frames to appreciate the feel and design logic of that camera. I now consider it to be unique and boldly designed rather than silly and WTF. Its looks are an acquired taste, certainly, but, the eye of the beholder. I know you’re a thorough researcher, but if you’ve seen one in person yet, it might be worth your while. As they used to say “Just hold an Asahi Pentax.”, your mileage may vary, of course.

    I’d be interested in reading your thoughts on the ZX/MZ-5n. There’s a smaller volume of Pentax articles on CP (ahem, James :)…) so I think that would fill in a little. There’s also the MZ-3 which shares most of the 5n’s functions but gets you to 1/4000s on the top end, maybe a shoot-out is in order? Just sayin’

  • While swapping the delicious Hexar RF for a watch isn’t the worst thing I’ve heard it probably can be forgiven. My own foray into the late-20th-century-35mm-RF hybrids (Contax G2) was even shorter. Pricey and underwhelming, yes the lenses were superb but after 3 or 4 rolls I was shrugging and my eye began to wander to all the other stuff I could have instead. I actually felt physical relief when I sold the whole package . . .and the money went into a new Chamonix 4X5.

  • I bought a Hexar RF new, to use with my then Leitz lenses. Nice camera, felt kind of big. But what turned me off was how loud it was. The motor drive seemed to scream after each shot. It was louder than my then current Nikon N80, which had a nicely dampened and muffled mirror sound. A rangefinder louder than an SLR was a no-go, and I let go of it pretty quickly, with some disappointment.

    Since then, no one else has mentioned the loudness of the Hexar, at least that I ever encountered. Maybe it was my unit?

    • Dear Ronin (sorry for my english),
      I came across your article because I was looking for an analogue RF for my street genre again after 5 years after a dead time from Leica M’sen (M6 MP M7). The current M courses, which I cannot understand, pushed me to find an alternative.
      I have bought a new Konica Hexar RF set according to the above picture of your contribution, which your contribution is partly to blame for – thank you for that!!
      After 4 days of handling practice:
      The Hexar RF exceeded my expectations. The rock-solid construction and the quality of workmanship is in my opinion on the same level as that of the analogue Leica M models. In the first haptic touch experience, it conveys a valuable feeling of precision and reliability, that of a tool for a demanding purpose, pure professional trust. All controls are located where they would be practically searched for. Their mechanical design is impeccable. As a Leica native, I find the viewfinder even better, there are no blackouts because the contrast of the viewfinder frames is higher. The handle supports designed on the front and back make the Hexar safer and easier to handle than an M. There would be a lot more from my subj. To note the list of features, I therefore recommend the interested party to take a look at the camera without reservation. A very clear recommendation, in my opinion an unjustly neglected camera.
      Finally, a neutralizing note regarding the volume:
      The street is louder and so the only one who hears the engine (in normal surroundings) is myself, because I know exactly when to “listen”.
      LG Dominique

Leave a Reply

Drew Chambers

Drew Chambers is a former high school teacher and current master's student at Harvard University. He lives in Waltham, Massachusetts with his wife and their perfect dog. Outside of teaching, reading, and writing, Drew spends most of his time listening to indie rock. He is happy when photographing.

All stories by:Drew Chambers