The Contax TVS is the Best Contax Compact to Buy Right Now

The Contax TVS is the Best Contax Compact to Buy Right Now

2800 1575 James Tocchio

Popular opinion on the Contax TVS says that its sluggish aperture and softer zoom lens make it a third-rate camera. The choir sings that the TVS is the compact Contax that you buy, only if you can’t afford the Contax T3 or T2 or T. There’s some truth to this, as is the case with most popular opinion, but a more nuanced and balanced voice might add enough useful commentary that people might realize just how good the Contax TVS is.

I’ll add that voice, partly because it’s my job. But also because I’ve spent the past few weeks shooting the TVS and I feel it’s been overlooked. I’ll even go so far as to make the bold claim that the Contax TVS is the one Contax compact that’s actually worth buying these days. Sure, it lacks certain capability compared with the others in its line, but the unique things that it offers over these other cameras do overbalance the few ways in which it comes up short.

What is the Contax TVS

In 1984, Kyocera released the Contax T, a titanium-bodied compact rangefinder camera aimed to satisfy the well-heeled photographer looking for a luxurious and incredibly compact 35mm film camera. This camera was exceptional, allowing creative control and packing a phenomenal Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 38mm f/2.8 lens in an astoundingly small and well-built body. It even had a synthetic ruby for its shutter release button.

In 1991, Kyocera further refined the formula with the Contax T2. This second of the series continued the high level of build, retained the same high performance lens and respectable creative controls, but added automation in the form of available autofocus. It was a true point-and-shoot camera, eschewing the manual focus rangefinder of the original T.

In 1994, Kyocera released the Contax TVS, a variant of the T series that swapped the prime lens of its predecessors for a Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-56mm f/3.5-6.5 zoom lens (the “VS” denotes that this is the Contax T with a “Vario-Sonnar” lens). Made of the same titanium as the earlier cameras, and fitted with all the latest technology, some shooters have described the Contax TVS as a zoomy version of the T2. This is coarsely true, but there are finer points that differentiate the TVS from every other model in the range.

The Contax TVS compared to the T, T2, and T3

As touched upon, the big gripe when comparing the TVS to the other Contax compacts is leveled against the relatively slow lens of the TVS. The other three cameras feature a maximum aperture of f/2.8. The TVS has a variable maximum aperture across its range of focal lengths, but at its fastest (at the wide-end of the range) it only reaches a maximum speed of f/3.5.

Sure, f/3.5 is slower than f/2.8, but is this really a problem? Let’s think about it. The difference between f/2.8 and f/3.5 in light-gathering potential is precisely 2/3rds of a stop. That’s really a very small difference and easily overcome. Simply by loading, for example, ISO 400 film instead of ISO 200, or ISO 800 in place of ISO 400, we more than completely mitigate the loss of light that we incur by shooting at f/3.5 versus f/2.8 (and then some).

But let’s concede, for the sake of argument, that the nearly insignificant loss of light we suffer on account of the slower aperture of the TVS actually will negatively impact our photo-making. It will only do so after the sun’s been down for an hour, or when shooting indoors in low-light, or in restaurants or parties, or dimly-lit clubs, or whatever it is that kids do with these cameras. But I argue that even in these proposed shooting environments, if the camera’s loaded with high speed film, Kodak P3200 or Ilford Delta 3200, or Cinestill 800t, or Kodak Portra 800, or Fuji Superia 1600, it’ll do just fine.

Complaining about the Contax TVS being slow because it can’t shoot crisp shots on Fuji 200 in a club at midnight is like giving a Chinese food restaurant a one-star Yelp review because you expected them to serve Cap’n Crunch. It’s not their fault.

But even if we don’t load fast film, f/3.5 is almost always a fast enough maximum aperture. I spent the hour after sunset shooting Kodak Ektachrome 100 through my TVS, and aside from a few shaky frames, shots on this extremely slow film were properly exposed and sharp when shot between f/3.5 and f/5.6. With a sensitive shutter release, comfortable grip, and no mirror-slap it’s an easy camera to shoot in low light.

I know there will be commenters that say something about subject isolation or some who may even drop the term “bokeh.” The Contax T series, even those cameras equipped with an f/2.8 maximum aperture, do not produce bokeh. And the subject isolation from any of these cameras will be indistinguishable from another when each is shot wide open. Furthermore, these are among the type of camera that’s typically shot at smaller apertures anyway, since they’re often used as snapshot machines, for travel or street photography, etc. With the T series, we get context, not bokeh, and the TVS is as good a context camera as the rest (possibly more so, for reasons I’ll discuss right now).

It’s the 28mm wide-end of that Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* lens. Thanks to this incredible lens, the Contax TVS offers the widest field-of-view of any of the Contax compacts. Compared with the 38mm lens of the Contax T and T2, the TVS lens is substantially wider. Even compared with the 35mm lens of the T3 there’s a noticeable difference. And sure, we could argue that simply taking five steps backward will get the same frame with the main-line T series cameras, but we could also argue that the TVS has something no other T series machine can match. For shooters looking for a 28mm Contax compact, there’s really only one choice, and that’s the TVS.

It’s true that this lens isn’t as sharp as the ones found in the T2 or T3, since some image quality is lost as the formula becomes more complex. But I’ve been shooting the TVS concurrently with the T2 for about three weeks, and the difference is so negligible as to reach the realm of pedantry. No one (in the real world) will be able to tell a TVS shot against a T2 shot based on sharpness.

What else?

It’s got a built-in flash, which the original Contax T does not. It’s got a decent AF system, which again is something lacking in the original T (that camera is manual focus only). It’s capable of exposure compensation to an astounding +/- 5 full stops (the T2 can only do +/- 2). It’s got manual dials for aperture, focus lock and exposure compensation, a combination of controls that’s not found on the overly-menu-focused T3. It’s got a panorama mode, which is a total gimmick, but a gimmick that can’t be found on any other T.

Oh, and it’s got that Vario-Sonnar, which is capable of zooming from a 28mm wide-angle to a 56mm focal length with hardly any discernible loss of image quality compared to the other T series machines. That’s pretty great.

Lastly, and so important that it’s the entire reason I think the Contax TVS is the only Contax T series camera worth buying today, is that it costs so little compared to the others in its lineup.

In the past few years, prices for the Contax T2 and T3 have surged on a wave of celebrity endorsement. Famous and (society tells me) beautiful people have been seen on television, at the Oscars, and on Instagram flashing the camera with their Contax T2s and T3s. Because of these popular influencers, prices have climbed to previously unthinkable (and unadvisable) heights. But while the T2 and T3 cost between $1,000 and $2,000 respectively (for perfect units from a reputable shop), the original Contax TVS sits at a price point closer to $250.

That’s an incredible price, considering it arguably (as I’ve argued) offers more than these other cameras. Even the second improved version of the TVS, the Contax TVS II, doesn’t match its brethren in price, selling typically for around $500. And the third version, though more expensive, tops out around $700 (this version is substantially different and, in my opinion, less of a unique offering due to its lens and menu system).

The non-Contax competition

But all of this doesn’t mean that the Contax TVS is the obvious choice for someone who’s simply looking for a compact point-and-shoot camera. Even for shooters looking for a compact camera with a 28mm lens (something a bit rare in the segment), it’s not the obvious choice. For shooters seeking wide point-and-shoots, there’s the Ricoh GR series, a series of cameras that have legendary 28mm f/2.8 lenses. But these usually cost more than the TVS. There’s the Fuji Natura Black, which features an even wider 24mm lens with an impossibly fast maximum aperture of f/1.9. But this camera is pretty rare and costs about three times the price of the Contax TVS.

For shooters who want a zoom-lensed compact, there are plenty of options that are decidedly less luxurious, but make equally excellent photos. These cameras get no respect – the Olympus Stylus zoom machines (especially the Wide Deluxe versions) offer similar specs at a lower price. The Minolta Freedom range offers some models with wider lenses, and these cameras are typically found for under $100.

As shown, there are options, but there’s no escaping the fact that for shooters who specifically want a Contax compact camera and who also want a 28mm lens, the TVS is the one camera to own.

Performance and real-world shooting

I’ve made a pretty strong case for the Contax TVS, and I stand by all that I’ve said. It’s a more balanced camera than the other Contax T machines, and a fantastic camera for the money. But it has enough flaws that the next few paragraphs will contain sprinklings of both praise, and criticism.

The Contax TVS is weighty and dense, characteristics of all of the Contax cameras of its era. Its titanium body panels fit tightly, its battery cover is metal, and its film door clicks heavily into place. The winding motors and shutter produce sounds that inspire confidence in its electromechanical innards, and a textured rubberized coating in critical locations creates confident handholds.

In short, the TVS feels like an exceptionally high quality camera. Until we look through the viewfinder, which is small and finicky, since any change to the angle of approach will create optical display issues that black out the edges of the frame. Only by repositioning the eyeball are we able to get back to centered and see the whole frame. It’s also less informative than I’d like. When operating outside of Program mode, there’s no indication in the viewfinder to show which aperture we’ve selected, and there’s no numerical indication of our relative focal length, which would be helpful since this directly influences how fast our aperture can be.

The film frame counter and flash mode display sit on the top of the camera in the form of LCD screens. These aren’t illuminated, which makes information gathering at night a total nightmare. In low light it’s nearly impossible to see whether or not we’re using exposure compensation, or which flash mode we’re using, or how many frames we’ve shot without looking through the viewfinder (exposure comp and flash mode are displayed here, but only incompletely).

The manual focus mode is acceptable, but I dislike using it. Essentially we spin a focus-scale-marked thumbwheel and set it to the distance to our subject. Then a half-press of the shutter release button will display a dot if we’ve set the correct distance, or a left or right arrow to show we need to adjust focus until the dot illuminates. It feels a bit clumsy in the same way that the Contax G series cameras’ manual focus systems feel clumsy, but it works. Since, for me, it is a slower method, I just use the AF.

Autofocus is fast and effective. While not as quick as later Contax T series cameras and certainly leisurely compared with modern AF, the Contax TVS achieves focus quickly and accurately in most situations. There’s an Infrared Focus Assist for shooting in low light, and this works well, too. Simply set the subject in the middle of the frame, then half-press the shutter and watch for the focus status lights (a dot illuminates to show focus has been successfully achieved, while an arrow flashes if the subject is too close). In the event that the camera can’t achieve focus, two arrows will flash (this happens very rarely).

The metering system shares its lock methodology with the autofocus system. A half-press of the shutter release button activates the center-weighted metering system and locks exposure, after which we’re able release the shutter or to recompose and shoot as desired. This system is accurate to a nearly perfect success rate.

Shutter release is near-silent and, more importantly, so is film advance. Some automated point-and-shoots have criminally loud film advance motors. This one, like the G series, is perfect for subtle shooting.

Manual aperture control is engaged by spinning a stiffly clickable ring at the base of the zoom lens. By rotating away from the Program mark, we deactivate Program mode and activate the aperture-priority mode. Now we’re free to select whatever aperture we like in single-stop increments. Just beyond this aperture dial is the manual zoom control. I love this tabbed ring, which doubles as an On/Off switch, and swings through a concise range to zoom or widen the Vario-Sonnar in a single, smooth sweep.

When flash is required, an indicator blinks in the viewfinder. The flash works well, and is balanced and controlled. With options for fill-flash, red-eye-reduction, and the ability to turn the flash off completely, the TVS can do its thing in any light (or lack thereof). The aesthetics of on-camera flash photography can be polarizing – some people love the look and some hate it. With the Contax TVS, I’ve found ways to make it work for me.

Image quality from the Vario-Sonnar is excellent in nearly all cases, but flawed in certain specific instances. There’s pretty heavy vignetting when shot with the aperture wide open. This light falloff is especially heavy when shot at the wide end of the zoom range. This rectifies itself if we shoot at apertures from f/5.6 and smaller, or when we’re zoomed in even a little bit (which may come from the maximum aperture closing as we travel the zoom range). There’s also very minor distortion on the far edges of the frame, only prevalent at the wide end of the range. This likely won’t be noticed by anyone in the real world.

Beyond these few minor qualms, this camera creates excellent images. Shots are sharp and punchy, full of that amazing Zeiss micro contrast on which the German optics brand has built its reputation since before any of us were born. The T* coating does its typically exceptional work and mitigates flares and ghosts and chromatic aberration.

Final thoughts

For what it offers, the Contax TVS is the best Contax compact camera available right now. Its combination of image quality, performance, and versatility at least matches its fellow T series cameras. What truly tips the scales, however, is its surprisingly low price. Getting this much Contax for this little money is hard to beat, and until prices for the T2 and T3 fall, the Contax TVS is the only Contax compact that’s currently worth the price.

Want your own Contax TVS?

Get it on eBay

Get it from our own F Stop Cameras

Follow Casual Photophile on Facebook and Instagram

[Some of the links in this article will direct users to our affiliates at B&H Photo, Amazon, and eBay. By purchasing anything using these links, Casual Photophile may receive a small commission at no additional charge to you. This helps Casual Photophile produce the content we produce. Many thanks for your support.]

James Tocchio

James Tocchio is a writer and photographer, and the founder of Casual Photophile. He’s spent years researching, collecting, and shooting classic and collectible cameras. In addition to his work here, he’s also the founder of the online camera shop

All stories by:James Tocchio
  • shootfilmridesteel March 24, 2019 at 4:27 pm

    Man, you’re killing me. We keep looking at the same stuff, and you put an article out before I can buy one. Hope the prices on these don’t spike.

  • One thing I always wonder with zoom point and shoots—when powered on, does the lens default to the widest part of range (28mm in the TVS case) or somewhere else, or does it remember the last focal length? I assume they all start full wide, but I’d love a point and shoot with a 35-70 that powers on at 50mm or remembers where I was when it powered off.

    • The zoom is entirely manual. That little nob near the lens is the power/zoom toggle.

    • I’ll try to think of a point-and-shoot that does that. You may want to look into the Yashica T4 zoom. It doesn’t reset to the same settings that you’d selected when it was shut off, but it does display the focal length in standard numbers and you’d be able to pretty rapidly set it to 50mm.

  • How did you do the double exposure? I cant figure out how to do that on my TVS.

    • A bit of a flub, actually. I had loaded the roll of Ektachrome into my Nikon SP and taken one shot (the Paramount sign). After which I quickly decided not to shoot that day. When it came time to test the TVS, I unloaded the Ektachrome from the SP to use it in the TVS, and that first shot turned into a double exposure. I liked the look, so I included it here. Apologies that it is a bit misleading.

    • I should add that you could likely do double exposures pretty easily with the TVS. You’d simply need to shoot an entire roll once using exposure compensation to compensate for the fact that you’ll be exposing the film twice, and then reload it with the same roll. The automated nature of the TVS film transport should theoretically place the frames on top of one another accurately. Tough to do it this way, but the results would be unpredictable and exciting.

  • David Millington March 26, 2019 at 2:56 pm

    Like all P&S cameras, if you know what you’re doing, the ‘shortcomings’ do not exist.
    There are some folk on the Internet who find fault with a camera just for the sake of it; ‘sigh’!!
    Perhaps for the ‘celebs’ these manual zooms/focus cameras are too difficult to use!
    Have had one of these for these last five years; my only complaint is the long end of the zoom often doesn’t feel long enough.
    But then, I can walk.
    I don’t think the zoom lens would be the size it is if it had a wider aperture, thus making it no longer a pocketable item; as you say above, who even gets out of bed for 2/3rd of a stop??
    Haven’t noticed any softness with the lens, but then, I don’t print large size.
    Vignetting is definitely an inconvenience, but, if you know what you’re doing, manageable.

  • James – great review & photos. I already own a G1 + 45mm + 90mm. I’ve been wanting a wider lens, but now the question gets a bit more difficult. I notice the TVS can be had for roughly the same price as an 28mm Biogon. I could carry my existing kit and the TVS in order to get to 28mm and avoid switching lenses. Or get the Biogon and all the greatness that comes with it (but have to switch lenses). Having shot with both, what would you do?

    • That’s a tough call. I think the image quality and low-light capability of the G1 and 28mm prime will be better than a TVS, but a TVS is smaller and more discreet. I think if it were me, I would get the 28mm Biogon. It’s a stellar lens. One of the best.

  • Back in the day when I shot color slides, I had at various times used a Contax T2, TVS, TVS III and T3. The TVS was by far the most advanced in technology and features of any T series, but my preference for slide film limited me to ISO of 100 or 400 in a pinch, so with the slow speed of the zoom at 56 coupled with vignetting at 28, I eventually moved on even though it was a great camera. The TVS III was optically a little better and much lighter, had fewer features but again was ultimately too slow in speed to keep long term. The T2 was a good shooter but sometimes AF using IR based detection would get fooled The T3 was the sharpest with best rendition of any compact, rivaling my Leica 35/2. There was no manual focus assist like in the T2 or TVS but the AF was very reliable. I eventually sold it as the stupid built-in lens cover would sometimes hang up. Other compacts tried were the Nikon 35 Ti and Rollei 35 SE. The SE pre-dated the Contax Ts and was one of my favorites because of the overall precision and lens quality producing some of my best images ever on film. Unfortunately,by the 1990’s the battery was discontinued and regardless, the Rollei’s meters were always a few stops less sensitive in low light than almost every other camera at the time.The Nikon Ti was nice but I liked the Zeiss rendering a little better.

  • Hi James,

    Thanks for this great review. I had my eye on the TVS for quite some time now.
    The only thing that I am wondering right now is, how do you set the ISO and what’s the maximum you can set it to?

    I bought a pair of expired 1000ISO roles, and I was wondering if this would be a camera to use them. Or maybe it’s better to stick to a manual SLR for that type of film roles.


    • Glad the review helped! ISO is set automatically via DX code and the camera can accept any ISO film from ISO 25 to ISO 5000. There is no way to manually set ISO on this camera, however you could use the ISO hacking methodology that many shooters use in Auto ISO cameras, whereby film is loaded into a canister with a different ISO than the film inside, or the ISO markings on the canisters themselves are painted over or modified. Hope this helps.

  • Hi James,

    Thanks for the comprehensive review. Do you know in what ways the Contax TVS and the TVS ii differ? Do you think it would be worth the extra money for the latter version?


  • Thanks for the review, very informative. However, please get rid of the custom mouse scroll buffering on your website, it makes me seasick!

  • Victoria Goddard April 12, 2022 at 10:27 am

    Which would you choose between between Contax tvs and the tvs ii?

    • Hi Victoria,
      I have had both (first the TVS II) and I really prefer the tab that extends the lens and adding a UV filter (30.5mm) so the lens cover issue becomes irrelevant. the only drawback I’ve found on the original TVS is that it defaults to flash automatic mode each time you turn on the camera, so in lower light you may accidentally shoot with flash if you forget to turn it off. I’m not the author of the article but wanted to share my experience. You can’t go wrong with either though, they take fantastic photos and are so similar.

      • Sorry, I was unclear in the first sentence – I had the TVS II first, but prefer the original TVS with the tab to zoom/power on.

  • Thanks so much Daniel. I went with the TVS and discovered the issue with the flash resetting each time very quickly! Otherwise it’s a great camera. All the best, Victoria

Leave a Reply

James Tocchio

James Tocchio is a writer and photographer, and the founder of Casual Photophile. He’s spent years researching, collecting, and shooting classic and collectible cameras. In addition to his work here, he’s also the founder of the online camera shop

All stories by:James Tocchio