A History of the Xenon Lens

A History of the Xenon Lens

2235 1257 Cheyenne Morrison

In the pantheon of fast Double-Gauss lenses from the 20th century, the Sonnar, Biotar, and Planar, are well known. But there’s also a lesser-known lens that is their equal; the Xenon. This lens was invented in 1925 by Dr. Albrecht Wilhelm Tronnier (1902-1982) while he was working for Jos. A. Schneider Optical Works in Bad Kreuznach, Germany, known as Schneider-Kreuznach. And while it is less heralded compared with more popular designs, the Xenon’s history and performance are worth a look (and a shoot).

The sample images in this article were made with my Schneider-Kreuznach Xenon 50mm F/1.9 (for Instamatic Reflex) which was manufactured between 1968-74 in Deckel or DKL mount, but the Xenon has been produced in a variety of lens mounts over the years including Leica thread or screw mount, Alpa, and most commonly M42. The majority of the post-war 50mm F/1.9 lenses are optically identical, only the lens barrels and mount differ. 

Xenon is Schneider-Kreuznach’s appellation for their asymmetric double-Gauss lens design, which resembles Zeiss’ Biotar/Planar/Sonnar lenses. In 1900 Zeiss chose to name their Anastigmatic lens Protar to separate it from competitors and trademarked the name to hamper their rivals. Subsequently all German lens manufacturers followed this practice of giving their lenses pseudo-scientific sounding names to lend them credibility and protect their inventions. 

Tronnier chose to name his lens design Xenon, which derived either from the Xenon atom with atomic number 54, or stemmed from the word Xenos the Greek word for “unknown.” Frankly, I think it most likely that the naming came in a similar way to how modern cars derive their names; for marketing purposes – sounding good and being easy to spell and pronounce. Once the Japanese consolidated their control of lens-making the process of giving names to designs slowed or ceased, and lenses were typically given only a manufacturer’s name and specification designations for focal length and maximum aperture.

Dr. Albrecht Wilhelm Tronnier, Inventor of the Xenon

The Xenon lens was invented by Dr. Albrecht Wilhelm Tronnier (Born 1902 – Died December 1, 1982) while he was chief designer of Jos. A. Schneider Optical Works in Bad Kreuznach, Germany from 1924 to 1936. Sadly, Dr. Tronnier does not share the fame of the other lens designers of his era such as Dr. Willy Walter Merté who invented the Biotar, or Ludwig J. Bertele who invented the Sonnar. But he has every right to fame – he invented the Xenon when he was only twenty-four years old, and then went on to have a remarkable career during which he accumulated 360 lens design patents. 

That the Xenon has been in continuous production by Schneider-Kreuznach from 1925 up to the present day, and the fact that it is still considered one of the best cine lenses in the world, is a testament to the design skills of Dr. Tronnier.

In 1924 Tronnier, then just twenty-two years old, joined Schneider Optik Works in Kreuznach, Germany as their chief lens designer. In the previous year Ludwig J. Bertele and A. Klughardt working at Ernemann had shocked the lens industry with their release of the Ernostar lens, which boasted the then unprecedented speed of F/2 for the 6 x 4.5 cm medium format Ernemann Ermanox plate camera. The speed and capability of the lens revolutionized photography by allowing photographers to shoot indoors and in low light situations. It was used to great effect by photographer Erich Salomon, who could be rightly dubbed the first Paparazzo because the lens allowed him to capture candid indoor photos. 

Tronnier was given the impossible challenge of developing a fast lens to compete with the Ernostar. He used some design elements from the Opic lens invented in 1920 by H.W. Lee of Taylor-Hobson in the United Kingdom. The Opic moderately collapsed the symmetrical structure of the Zeiss Planar from 1896, and reduced spherical, chromatic and field curvature aberration in the symmetrical Gaussian design. Tronnier adopted the asymmetrical design of the Opic, but to be able to achieve his goal he needed to create a six element lens. However, to achieve the desired speed the front elements had to curve, which increased the refractive index and introduced large aberrations from each element. 

Tronnier completed the project three years after starting, in 1925, and patented the Xenon F/2, an asymmetrical Double-Gauss design of six elements in four groups, equivalent to the Opic with German Patent #DE 439556. 

The methods Tronnier used to develop the Xenon, specifically by splitting cemented lenses into single groups and through the use of five to six lens elements, anticipated the solutions for high-speed lenses which are still used to this day. After WWII Tronnier was appointed by the British occupational administration as Chief Designer of Voigtländer. He then designed (or oversaw the design of) numerous lenses, including the Ultron F/2, Nokton F/1.5 and Color-Skopar F/2.8, the Color Heliar F/3.5 for the Bessa II, Ultragon, Skopargon, Dynarex, Skoparex, and the famed APO Lanthar lens.

The Leitz Xenon 

Sadly for Tronnier, before the Xenon could be released to market Ludwig J. Bertele (who at the time had begun working at Zeiss after that brand had absorbed Ernemann) developed the Sonnar lens formula in 1931, which became publicly available as a 5cm F/1.5 lens on the Zeiss Contax I in 1932. The Sonnar was ground-breaking, and the seven elements in three groups design became a great commercial success. 

Leica, who were up and coming competitors to Zeiss’ Contax with the recently released Leica IIIa 35mm camera, needed a fast lens to compete with the Sonnar. So Ernst Leitz engaged Schneider-Kreuznach to create a fast lens. The Leitz-Xenon 5cm F/1.5 lens referencing Taylor-Hobson British patent 373950 and US patent 2019985 which was originally designed as a cinema lens came into production in 1936.  Zeiss’s Sonnar had already captured the market, and the Xenon only sold a fraction of the amount of the Sonnar. 

Interestingly, the first model of the Leitz Summilux 50mm F/1.5 (of 1959) was identical in cross-section to the Xenon/Summarit, but was an improvement over the earlier lenses because of the use of the newly invented high refractive index Lanthanum glass. 

The second version of the Summilux, introduced in 1962, was a redesign of the first version Summilux by Dr. Mandler of E. Leitz Canada in Midland. The modern Leitz Summarit 50mm more closely resembles the design of the Zeiss Biotar. Leitz was not able to offer a lens with significantly greater performance over the Summilux until 2003, when they introduced the Summilux ASPH FLE lens, which incorporated a floating element and exotic glass.

Descendants of the Xenon 

Although the Xenon is less well-known than its competitors, many photographers own a lens which owes its design to it. The Xenon design went on to become the basis for a host of fast lenses made by Japanese lens manufacturers, up to the present day. Here are just a handful of the many lenses that are based on the Xenon design. 

Konica Hexanon 60mm F/1.2 : The Nikon Historical Society Journal number 58 (NHS-58 Journal) relates the interesting story of the origin of many fast lenses developed in Japan following WWII. At that time, the Japanese government requested that the top five lens manufactures in Japan combine their technical expertise to create an ultra-fast lens of F/0.65 or F/0.85 for use in X-ray machines.

Those five optical companies were Fuji Kogaku (Fujica/Fuji), Konica Kogaku, Chiyoda Kogaku (Minolta), Nippon Kogaku (Nikon), and Ohara Kogaku. The project was assisted by the fact that when Japan and Germany had signed the Axis pact in 1940, Adolf Hitler transferred nearly all of the patent rights from Carl Zeiss to the Japanese government. Two results from this government scheme were the Konica Hexanon 60mm F/1.2, and the Nikkor-N 1:1.1 F=5cm, both based on the Xenon design. 

Nikkor-N 1:1.1 F=5cm : In 1930 Tronnier patented an improvement of the Xenon design with three attached rear lenses, an eight element F/1.2 lens (spherical, chromatic and astigmatic corrected). After WWII the design was used by Saburo Murakami at Nikon as the basis for the Nikkor-N 1:1.1 F=5cm with eight elements in six groups. When it was released in 1956 it was the world’s fastest 35mm lens (trivia: Che Guevara owned and used one for reportage).  

Nokton & Ultron 

After WWII Tronnier continued to work on the Xenon design which led to the invention of two other lenses, the Voigtlander Nokton and Ultron lenses. The suffix “on” showed it was a derivative of the Xenon, and this nomenclature continue with the Ultron. Similarly to the Xenon these two designs were used as the basis for a variety of fast lenses in the 1970s. 

Voigtländer Nokton : In 1947 Tronnier used the Xenon as the basis for an upgraded lens called the Nokton. Being very difficult to get a patent in Germany following the war, he patented the lens in Switzerland in 1950. To his original Xenon design Tronnier added a rear lens to increase performance, and the 50mm F/2 lens was first released with the Vito/ Vitomatic/Vitessa cameras. The version for the Voigtländer Prominent is the famed 50mm F/1.5. 

Voigtländer Ultron : The Ultron has been a famed lens since its introduction as the top of the line lens for the Voigtländer Vitessa and Prominent cameras. This original 50mm F/2 version released with the Voigtländer Prominent is reputed to have twice the resolution of competitors like the Leitz Summicron F/2, and Summitar F/2 at 165 lines per millimeter at F/4. 

During the mid 1950s the second generation Ultron was redeveloped using a very early Zuse computer. This lens with seven elements in six groups, the Ultron 1.8/50 was first produced between July 1968 and December 1971, and famously had the highly unusual attribute of a concave front element. This version of the Ultron produced in M42 and Rollei QBM mounts is reputed to be one of the best 50mm lenses ever produced and is highly sought after by collectors. 

Carl Zeiss Planar 50mm F/1.4 : As part of Zeiss’ purchase of Voigtländer AG in 1975, Zeiss came into ownership of Tronnier’s patents. In 1972, Karl-Heinrich Behrens and Erhard Glatzel updated the Xenon design by adding an extra front lens, making it seven elements in six groups. Zeiss marketed this lens as the Carl Zeiss Planar 50mm F/1.4 in Contax Yashica mount, an absolutely stellar lens (which James reviewed here).

Schneider-Kreuznach Xenon 50mm F/1.9 for Instamatic Reflex : Kodak’s Retina series of cameras was a long-running line of premium cameras produced by Kodak AG in Germany. The early folding models had the “Kleinbild” 50mm F/2 Xenon lens, but it wasn’t until the Retina Reflex series was released that the F/1.9 model of the lens appeared. Kodak’s Retina Reflex III with the Xenon 50mm F/1.9 cost $248.50 in 1961, the equivalent adjusted value is $3,622 USD in 2019.  

The Kodak Instamatic Reflex was an SLR made in Germany by Kodak AG from 1968 to 1974. It was one of the last cameras to come out under the famed Retina name and was the most sophisticated cameras ever produced to use 126 Instamatic film. Using the Kodak Retina lens mount, sometimes called Deckel mount or DKL mount the camera’s “kit” lenses were the Schneider-Kreuznach Xenar 45mm F/2.8 and the fast Xenon 50mm F/1.9.

How good is the Xenon?

Being a late model of the Xenon, my lens was in almost brand-new condition, which is quite common because the Retina version came in beautifully designed hard plastic cases which tended to protect them from damage. As with all Schneider-Kreuznach lenses the build quality is tops, epitomizing the workmanship that Germany was famed for. The hardened chrome finish resists wear, and even well-used copies don’t show their age. 

The signature look of the Xenon is a remarkable sharpness across the whole frame, even wide open, and a beautiful, painterly bokeh, as well as the vibrant color rendition for which Schneider lenses are famous. Look at the sharpness, bokeh and vibrant colors of the shots I have taken with my Xenon. I think they speak for themselves. 

I am a big fan of Agfa Ultra Color 100, but sadly it is long discontinued, but ordinary Ektar 100 and the Xenon produces almost the same level of vibrant color.  A good comparison to visualize the bokeh of Xenon is to compare it to that of the Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 58mm, or its descendant the Helios 44. To me the famed swirly bokeh of theses lenses reminds me of the brushstrokes of a Vincent Van Gogh painting, wild and almost hallucinatory, and definitely not to everyone’s taste. Whereas the Xenon resembles the delicate brush strokes of a Monet. 

I own the DKL version mentioned above, so my opinions are reserved solely for that model, but optically the many versions of the Xenon perform similarly. I’m still lusting after an early M42 version. But the relative disinterest from collectors in this DKL mount version is a benefit to shrewd shoppers. With some time and patience it’s possible to pick up a copy of this legendary lens formula for very little cash.

Buying Tips

As far as trying to buy a good Xenon lens, we can exclude the lenses made for Retina cameras as they aren’t practical everyday shooters. But the Xenon came in a variety of lens mounts Exakta, Praktica, Robot Berning, Rollei QBM, M42 and even Alpa (which tend to be expensive because of the collectability factor). Even more uncommon is the Leitz Xenon 50mm F/1.5 which was produced from 1936 to 1950 in Leica thread mount. Only 6,190 were produced, and buyers of this version will be paying for rarity. 

During the 1950s and ‘60s the Xenon competed against prestigious lenses such as the Steinheil Quinon or Rodenstock Heligon and was on par with both. Both of those now fetch high prices, but you can buy a Xenon for a fraction of the price. The M42 mount is one of the most common, and easily adaptable to mirrorless digital cameras, and many copies in good condition are readily available. 

But the best value for money is the DKL mount version, like mine, because they were produced in large quantities for the Kodak Retina cameras, and DKL mount is not as sought after. These DKL lenses are astonishingly good, and only five to ten percent the cost of a comparable Leitz lens. The one downside is that buyers will need a DKL adapter, but they are readily available, and I would recommend buying the best quality one made by Yeenon. 

The final lens hunting tip I’ll suggest is to look for the camera, not the lens. I bought my lens for $40 USD when I found it mounted to a Kodak Instamatic Reflex camera and told the seller to just keep the camera and send me the lens. Because the Instamatic Reflex takes 126 cartridge film, it is not as popular as the Kodak Retina cameras, and there’s no demand for these models. Through this trick, it’s possible to get a lens with legendary pedigree for an unbelievably low price. Happy hunting. 

Want your own Xenon 50mm F/1.9?

Search for one on eBay

Follow Casual Photophile on Facebook and Instagram

[Some of the links in this article will direct users to our affiliates at B&H Photo, Amazon, and eBay. By purchasing anything using these links, Casual Photophile may receive a small commission at no additional charge to you. This helps Casual Photophile produce the content we produce. Many thanks for your support.]

Cheyenne Morrison

In today’s digitally obsessed world I've chosen to return to old-school analogue photography, vintage cameras, classic manual focus lenses, and expired film. This combination of elements results in images that cannot be created digitally.

All stories by:Cheyenne Morrison
  • One very minor historical note about the Opic lens, designed by Horace William Lee for production by Taylor, Taylor and Hobson of Leicester, England (a very similar, maybe identical lens was also made by Cooke Optical, an associate company and nowadays a subsidiary of T,T&H). H W Lee did not work directly for T,T&H but had his own optical design bureau based in London, called the Kallista Company. I would assume he must have sold the design rights to T,T&H, since as you say, the patents are certainly in their name. I have the post war coated version of the Xenon, the Leica Summarit in LTM. It is the lens I go to when I want very dreamy and swirly bokeh.

    • Cheyenne Morrison March 11, 2019 at 7:25 am

      Thanks Wilson, sadly when researching lens history many erroneous facts get repeated, so thanks for the update about the Opic. The Summarit seems to divide people a lot, I guess Leicaphiles aren’t keen on swirly bokeh.

    • Wilson, I have the same version Summarit, s/n 820963. I love how it rendered with colour neg film but there is a problem when it comes to using it on my Sony A7 and Nex 5N. Wide open it is soft, as one may expect, but improves noticeably from f2. The problem is that in good lighting i.e. outdoors with sun, it becomes unusable from around f5.6 when a circular purple blur starts to form in the centre of the image and which gets smaller, but progressively more noticeable, upon stopping down. The lens has the basic light blue coating of that era and the optics are clear and all would appear to be in order. Have you used yours on a digital camera?

      • hello Terry, you need to send your A7 to have thin filter conversion like what Leica digital Ms have with their sensors. the problem with sony A series is their sensor protector is thicker than usual which is not optimize for RF lenses. if you wanna more details you can message me via instagram “LeicaPorter”

        • Hi, Chris, thanks for taking time out to reply.

          I’m not sure that the thickness of the sensor’s AA filter is the issue here. I’ve used a variety of r/f lenses that don’t exhibit the same problem and these cover CV 15mm Heliar, 35mm Ultron, 50mm Nokton, 28mm Orion-15 (USSR), 35mm Summaron, 4 different versions of 50mm Industars, and a handful of Contax f1.5 Sonnars and 50 Tessar and Canon LTM 1.8 50, plus Topcor-s from my Leotax. Then there are the many slr lenses tried.

          Whilst some lenses work less well at the edges, an expected outcome for r/f lenses on a FF sensor, the Summarit is alone in producing this magenta haze circle only in the central part of the image and which starts to become just visible around f5.6, but gradully becomes more pronounced in colour as the lens is stopped down further. At the same time that the lens is stopped down, the size of the haze disc also gets smaller.

          Now that I’m using Fuji-X it may be an interesting experiment to see how the Summarit performs with this sensor, and which I understand doesn’t have an AA filter. Since the earlier testing, I’ve also acquired the correct lenshood, so if flare is an issue with the lens, as I’ve read, then I wonder if this will also make a difference.

          • even tho some sensors are without AA filter theres still a protection glass in front of the sensor to stop you damaging the sensor. that glass on the Sony A series is quite thick.

    • In the patent document of OPIC lens, GBP 157040, the applicant were “Taylor, Taylor & Hobson Ltd.” together with Horace William Lee.
      There were also some journal papers dated from 1924 to 1935, filed by “H. W. Lee, The Taylor-Hobson Research Department”.
      It was clearly that Lee worked for TTH for decades.

  • Many thanks for your insightful overview of the Xenon and its derivatives. I’d always believed that the speed of Xenon lenses ranged from f2 to f1.5 but there exists a f2.8 version fitted to a Kodak Retina IIc which I acquired recently and which I was prompted to buy when I saw it was equipped with a Xenon. But the f2.8 seems to be a bit of an oddity in the range. Did your research throw up any light on this version and, if so, what exactly is it?

    • Cheyenne Morrison March 12, 2019 at 12:10 am

      Terry, are you sure it is a Xenon, not a Xenar?

      • Hi, Cheyenne. No, it isn’t a Xenar, and from what I’ve discovered since posing the question of you, neither is it a fake.

        With my IIc the lens s/n is keyed to its twin which is on a small plate and which is part of the shutter body.

        Since reading your post and my enquiry, I decided upon doing a little digging and have found a reference to the f2.8 version as fitted to the IIc and which you can read about here. The embedded link takes you to a Kodak related site where, inter alia, Mischa Koning has reproduced the complete Focal Press Retina Guide and from which the lens info has been obtained.


        “THE RETINA IIc AND IIC of 1954 and 1958 respectively are fitted with a 2 in. (50mm) six-element Xenon C or Heligon C f2.8 lens. The lens system is convertible with a removable front component which can be replaced by alternative units to form a telephoto and wide-angle lens system. The IIc and IIC have a built-in rangefinder coupled to the lens and in one eyepiece with the bright-line reflector frame viewfinder. On the model IIC the viewfinder is extra large and also incorporates two additional frame lines which indicate the field covered by the alternative lenses.”

        So, on the face of it, here we have the highly respected Xenon in a six-element f2.8/50 version. Is this configuration unique? Did Kodak specifically ask Schneider to produce it in order to help keep the cost of the cameras down, but whilst at the same time maintaining quality? Why is so little known about it? Could it be that in the film era the equivalent of pixel count was the kudos of a fast lens and with “only” an f2.8 lens one didn’t have much to show off at the local camera club?

        • Cheyenne Morrison March 14, 2019 at 8:16 am

          I know that Schneider made a rare 5 element Xenar for folding cameras like the Certo before WWII, but the Retina lenses I am not so familiar with. But I do recall the 6 element Xenon was created by adding an extra front element.

          • Cheyenne, I’ve been doing a little more digging, and discovered that Schneider listed a 50mm f2,8 Xenon but described it as a cine lens.
            I’ve also made a request of the present day Schneider Company if their factory records can shed any light on the matter regarding the Retina Xenon-C and I’ll post here if I get a response.

            That’s interesting about the Xenar. I can’t recall ever coming across any info about it.

        • I have the Retina IIC and IIIC, and 1B: the 50/2.8 Xenon and 50/2 have identical rear groups in the camera. The front section of the 50/2.8 is a “truncated” optic of the F2 front group. My late IIC accepts the 50/2 front group, the aperture opens up to the unmarked F2 setting. The camera works perfectly with the new front group. Matching the rear group, front group, and mount of the Retina by Serial Numbers on all three was necessary to prevent mixing Rodenstock and Schneider elements, and Xenon and Xenar elements. The 1B uses the 50/2.8 Xenar, uses the same removable bayonet for the front element- but is optically incompatible. I believe, but have not tried. putting a Xenon front and rear into the Retina 1B.

          The 5-element 5cm F2.8 Xenar is a very different formula from the Xenon. I found a loose 5cm F2.8 Karat-Xenar at a camera show, converted it to Leica mount. It’s better than the Tessar 5cm F2.8.

        • Terry, did you find out if the IIc cameras with the 2.8 Xenons have a 2.8 version of the 6-element lens? Or do they have the 5-element lens? Excuse me if I misunderstood some of the discussion above.

          • Hi, Andrew. Steffen Mahler of Schneider Optic did get back to me and confirmed that the f2.8 Retina Xenon is of 6 element construction.

  • Brent Pearse (@brentpearse) March 11, 2019 at 11:52 am

    Wow, great in depth detailed history and review, much appreciated.

  • Do you now anything about the Schneider 50mm 1.5 xenon? I have one in Leica thread mount that came on my iiif and it’s difficult to find out much about it. Here’s a link to what I can find out but it there’s not much there. https://lens-db.com/schneider-kreuznach-xenon-50mm-f15/

    • Terry, There is every indication that the f1.5/50 Xenon is one and the same as the f1.5/50 Summarit. In my Hove publication “Leica Pocket Book, 8th Edition”, the two lenses are shown side by side on adjacent pages. From a cursory look at the images, the lens barrels look remarkably similar but I suspect one would need a copy of each in hand to distinguish any differences.

      There was conjecture at the time about the provenance of the Summarit, with some believing it was a new design, with new glass that became available after WWII, the Summarit having come out in 1949, and the Xenon last came out in 1948. However, set against this is the fact that the lens was ready for production in 1939, as determined by allocated serial numbers, and the Xenon come to market in 1936. The lenses appear to be identical in every respect, and this is confirmed by Leitz factory records. In performance terms, the Guide reports that the lenses are very similar, if not identical. However, there is a comment about the Xenon being susceptible to fogging, and so should be kept dry. No such comment is made about the Summarit.

      The Xenon has rarity value on its side with just 6,190 units produced over the period 1936 to 1948. In comparison, the Summarit sold 39,181 units in screw mount from 1949 to 1960, and 25,689 in M mount from 1954 to 1960.

      • Cheyenne Morrison March 13, 2019 at 4:38 am

        There is a load more evidence that I have from many sources that the Xenon and post war Summarit are identical with the exception that the Summarit had a coated lens. This is an in depth history, use Google Translate to read as it’s in Japanese … https://spiral-m42.blogspot.com/2011/04/leitz-xenonsummarit-5cm-f15.html

        • Thanks, interesting translation. As good as google translate is, not quite there, yet. Still required some verbal gymnastics at certain points to determine what the author was saying. Erwin Puts, in his Leica Lens Compendium, also compares them.

        • Steffen Mahler, of Schneider Optical, kindly replied to my enquiry about the f2.8 Xenon. He wasn’t able to find much in the historical company records, but he was able to confirm that the f2.8/50 Retina Xenon-C is of 6-Element construction.

      • I have both the Xenon 5cm F1.5 and currently have two Summarits. The Xenon is optimized for wide-open use at minimum focus, the Summarit is optimized for F2.8 at minimum distance. The Xenon uses a Hex shaped aperture ring, which reduces apparent focus shift when stopping down. Both lenses are subject to fogging on each side of the aperture blades. I’ve had one of the Summarits for almost 20 years- taking apart and cleaning is required about every 10~15 years. The Xenon- probably about the same. Taking these lenses apart is “not intuitive”.


        The Summarit and Xenon 5cm F1.5 are both under-rated. The front elements are softer than the 5cm F1.5 Sonnar, and finding a clean one is not easy. Once found, be ready to do a CLA on it.


        • Brian, thanks for the links.

          I’m not entirely sure why some examples of particular lenses develop haze and other samples don’t. I feel it has to do with how the lenses are stored over their life and possibly the atmospheric conditions encountered whilst in use. My sample of the LTM Summarit is completely free of haze and fungus, but has acquired a few very slight cleaning marks on the front element. I acquired it in the late 1970’s and it has never needed a CLA and focusing is still very smooth. Could all this be down to the fact it has always been stored in temperate, and never damp, conditions in my living room?

          One of the links referred to the lens’ actual focal length. There is a reason for this not often reported on. Whilst it plays a function in calibrating with a rangefinder, it was also used in scientific photography where it was necessary to know the actual magnification factor of the actual lens being used. All lenses marked as 50mm, are always nominal, unless by chance you latch on to one that is 50mm.

        • The Collectors Forum of the Leica Users Forum published the detailed “prescription” of the Summarit. The optical formula of the Summarit was changed, specifically the curvature of one of the elements. The Summarit is a revised design, probably to tame spherical aberration.

  • That was a very enjoyable review. Thank you!

  • Dr Ricardo Davidson March 12, 2019 at 7:21 pm

    Actually, the Sonnar f2 and f1.5 are Cooke Triplet derivatives, not Double Gauss derivatives.

  • Wow, this was insanely interesting! Also the photographs you took with yours are outstanding. I now appreciate my lenses even more.

  • The first serious 35mm camera I used in the 1960’s was a Leica IIIa which had a Taylor-Hobson 50mm fl.5-9 Xenon mounted. It was a pre-World War II uncoated version that weighed as much as the IIIa body. It delivered hazy, not-very-sharp pictures due to accumulated dirt between the lens elements. I used it until I could find a 1950’s 50mm f/3.5-22 collapsible Elmar, which produced contrasty, tack-sharp Kodachromes and black-and-white images. I’ve often wondered about the background of this speedy lens, since James Lager’s Leica book is short of details. It’s nice to know how it evolved over years from the days of “High Speed” Anscochrome (ISO 100) to new Ektachrome 100 modern times.

  • I’m just curious, but what adapter are you using to attach a DKL lens to a C/Y camera? I’ve got a couple Contax’s and would love to use my SK Xenon 50/1.9 on my 167MT/139MM.

  • Thank you for a excellent article.

  • Great article. I’m a fan of anything Schneider Kreuznach. Also, many thanks for the link, I just picked up a 50mm f1.9 in DKL mount.

  • “In the pantheon of fast Double-Gauss lenses from the 20th century, the Sonnar, Biotar, and Planar, are well known.” This suggests that Sonnar is a Double-Gauss design, which it of course is not.

  • Dr. Tronnier is also the designer of the Schneider-Kreuznach Angulon, a 82° field lens produced for an amazing ~60 years from 1932, for view and press cameras from 6×9cm to 8×10″. The lens is also incredibly thin, scarcely protruding from its shutter. 6 elements in two triplet groups. Another Tronnier masterpiece.

  • Anderl Querengässer June 19, 2020 at 3:18 pm


    Könte ein Schneider Edixa Xenon 1.9/50mm für M42 bekommen jedoch über diese Version gibt es sehr wenig Informationen habe schon etwas länger recherchiert. Die Version die ich meine ist Zebra Version allerdings die schmale Zebra Version.
    Irgendwelche Tips wo ich noch Informationen herbekommen kann?

    Danke vorab

    • Cheyenne Morrison January 17, 2021 at 9:19 pm

      Es tut mir leid, ich habe nicht viele Informationen über die späteren Zebra-Versionen gemacht. M42-Halterungen sind jedoch allgemein verfügbar. Suchen Sie nach Edixa-Xenon.

  • Excellent article overall, but I have a couple of quibbles:

    First, “Minolta Kogaku” is mentioned as one of the group of 5 companies commissioned to produce high-speed X-Ray lenses. The company now known as Minolta was never known by this name. At the time, it would have been known as “Chiyoda Kogaku” or “Chiyoko.”

    The other point I take issue with is the assertion that the build quality on the Schneider Retina lenses was “tops.” The build quality in reality is quite poor compared to that of other DKL mount lenses such as the Voigtlander lenses for the Bessamtic and Ultramatic systems, and even the Rodenstock lenses sold with the Retinas in Europe. Where those lenses used chromed brass, Schneider employed soft aluminum, not even bothering to anodize the flared front of the barrel. As a result, the majority of examples of the lens that is the subject of this article, the 50mm f/1.9 Retina Xenon, are found with moderately to severely dented filter rings, as are the similarly-built 28mm Schneider Retina-Curtagons.

    Likewise, while German lenses are often impressive in their intricacy, they also tend to suffer from overengineering and unnecessary complexity of their mechanisms. This lens is no exception, with the Rube Goldberg-esque Deckel aperture system prone to malfunction and failure. Note, this criticism isn’t particular to this lens – pretty much all DKL mount lenses suffer from these problems. Compared to, for-example, the Asahi Takumar lenses being produced in Japan at the same time as the later Retina run, and these Schneiders aren’t even in the same league build-wise.

    That’s not to say I don’t absolutely adore my own copy of this lens. It is truly a gem optically, and worth what quirks it brings with it.

    • I’m not sure how I missed the Minolta nomenclature in my editing of the article. Will fix that now. As an owner of plenty Chiyoda Kogaku lenses, how embarrassing! 🙂

      • Cheyenne Morrison January 17, 2021 at 9:16 pm

        Brian, the name Minolta Kogaku was taken from an intelligence report published in the early 1950s about post-war Japanese construction by the USA. I included as was because I was quoting from original documents, even though as you point out they were incorrect.

        “According to Nikon Historical Society Journal number 58(NHS-58 Journal) the Nikkor-N 5cm f1.1 was the product of research by “five of the top optical manufacturers in Japan” as the Japanese government requested that these five companies use all their technical resources to produce an ultra fast lens of “F0.65 or F0.85 lens for use on the Japanese X-ray machines”.

        The five optical companies were:

        • Fuji Kogaku
        • Konica Kogaku
        • Minolta Kogaku
        • Nippon Kogaku
        • Ohara Kogaku

        The main objective of this research was to produce new glass types.

        The Nikkor -N 1.1, Fuji 5cm 1.2 and Konica 60mm 1.2 are all products of the Joint venture.”

    • Another Brian.

      I’ve had several 50/1.9 Retina Xenons, three different versions. 58mm Filter ring with RF coupling, 58mm Filter ring no RF coupling, and 52mm filter/ close focus to 2ft. The latter was for the Instamatic Reflex. The earlier lenses are heavier built, I’ve never had a problem with them in 35+ years. Used to sell for $10. I use one on a Nikon Df with F-mount to Deckel adapter.

      I picked up the eight Chiyoko Rokkor lenses made in Leica mount. The 50/1.8 is a 6/5 derivative of the Ultron, as is the Hexanon 50/1.9. The latter- mine must be an early version, uses 39.5mm filters. I’ve seen most people state they use 40.5mm filters.

  • Chef Dino Guingona July 29, 2020 at 6:19 pm

    Excellent, well written review on this gem of a lens. Truly appreciate this post!

  • I own a Nokton and an Ultron in Prominent mount. With the Amedeo made adapter I can use these lenses with RF coupling on my Leica M cameras.
    Thanks for all the details discussed here by all involved. I also own an Ultron 50/1.8 in QBM mount for the Rollei. I can use it with M 4/3 cameras or with the Rollei SLR cameras such as the SL35/.

  • I really enjoyed reading this review. I read it in fact several times until I got my own Xenon (QBM). I have however looked for the Ultron (I had one on my Vitessa N and loved it a lot) for my Rolleiflex SL35, only to discover that the Voigtländer Color-Ultron 50/1.8 is apparently nothing more than the CZ Planar labelled as such for Voigtländer, and not a faster version of my beloved Ultron 50/2, just as it’s also reballed as the Rollei Planar HFT…

  • Thank you for this extremely informative review. I learned a lot from it. One thing, though, that you didn’t mention concerning the Deckel-mount Retina-Xenon 50mm f1.9 is that it came in two versions, one for the Instamatic Reflex SLR and the other for the Retina IIIS rangefinder. The two types are identical except that the latter has a curved slot on the back next to the mount through which a cam communicates with the rangefinder of the IIIS. I have copies of both.

    • I own three Xenons – 2 for Exaktas, the first and last automatic mount types and one mounted on my Retina IIIs, which is a great but underrated camera. Wonderful lenses, which were actually one of the most prestigious for the Exakta line. Other really cool lenses are in Schneider’s LM (light meter) line which were made for Exakta mount and I believe M 42 cameras. Schneider designed an attached coupled light meter on the Xenon, the Curtagon wide angle, and their 135 mm telephoto. You set the ASA (ISO) and the camera shutter speed, line up the needle on the meter and the lens aperture is automatically set.Totally cool!
      Also, I have always been curious about ISCO lenses, which were supposedly a lower cost lens line made by Schneider. It is my understanding that ISCO stands for Joseph (I) Schneider (S) Company (CO). I have a number of ISCO lenses for Exaktas and find them to be very fine performers. In many ways, I think that the mounts and diaphragms are more robust, while the fit and finish of the lens mounts are equal to the Schneider lenses.
      I would certainly like to hear more about ISCO lenses and their relationship to Schneider.

  • Hello, to your knowledge any optical difference between Xenon 50mm f2 in Exacta mount vs 50mm f1,9 in Retina mount?

    • Cheyenne Morrison May 24, 2022 at 7:41 pm

      While the formula may be the same, I really cannot state the exact differences between the two.

  • Super curious about where the Schneider-Kreuznach Xenotar 3.5 on my Rolleiflex fits into this picture…

    • Cheyenne Morrison May 24, 2022 at 7:51 pm

      Xenotar was Schneider-Kreuznach’s designation for a 5 elements in 4 groups lens i.e. a Biotar/Planar formula. The version used on the Rollei is a very good lens.

  • I have recently acquired a Leica iiia which was fitted with a Xenon 5cm f/1.5 serial 289xxx D.R.P. This lens is in spectacular condition (as is the camera). I have seen only a few Xenon 5cm f/1.5 on eBay, some have 4 knurled rings and some have only 3 knurled rings. Mine is 3. Does anyone know the difference between the two?

  • Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro July 27, 2022 at 2:12 am

    Great historical review! I’ve learned to photograph from my father as a child with a 1964 Kodak Retina Reflex III, which I still have to this day with three marvellous Schneider Retina lenses (DKL mount): the Retina Xenon 50mm f/1.9 (object of this post), the Retina Curtagon 28mm f/4 and the Retina Tele-Xenar 135mm f/4. And yes, they render like no other lens. The Retina Reflex III is OK but quite fragile and a nightmare to repair nowadays, so I avoid to use it. Also, mine’s Synchro Compur leaf shutter gets a bit stuck sometimes, trying to get the nerve to send it somewhere for CLA but I may no longer be able to put it in functional form (the shutter may no longer be reliable even after CLA). In view of that, I started looking for a more modern replacement body so I could use these lenses at least with an adapter.

    My current solution ended up quite close to yours: past year I found a Contax S2b with (what do you know?) a Contax Zeiss Planar 50mm f/1.4 (MMJ version), so I bought a C/Y-M42 adapter and a M42-DKL adapter for use in tandem as well. It’s a bit annoying to use two adapters since I don’t want to stop using the Planar (so I don’t keep the C/Y-M42 adapter on the S2b as you do with your Aria) and the ones I bought end up with the lens’ focus distance indicator slightly off the top of the barrel after everything is assembled, but hey, it works! The M42-DKL adapter stops down the lens, so they’re a bit awkward to focus in smaller apertures since I’m not sure these lenses are devoid of focus shift (never actually tried to focus and then change aperture to find out). Finally, the M42-DKL adapter I got is pretty well-built (all metal, cannot recall the brand) but its aperture ring is not very ergonomic (it’s a bit hard and sometimes hurts my fingertips) – that, together with the aforementioned focus distance indicator’s misalignment, made slightly unsatisfied overall with my solution to keep using my Schneider Retina glass. I’ll try to get the Yeenon adapter instead to see if things improve.

    I’m also considering getting a Nikon film SLR body to use these lenses since Nikon F-DKL adapters are easy to find – I’ve got a Fotodiox one for use with my Nikon D850 DSLR which works marvellously well (it even has a de-click switch for the aperture ring). The downside is that the mirror hits the back of the lens barrel of the Xenon and the Curtagon when they’re focused at infinity (the Tele-Xenar works just fine). I got word that this doesn’t happen (at least with the Xenon) in the F3 and the F5. I currently have my eye on the FM3a, hoping its mirror is also able to avoid hitting these lenses, but couldn’t find any use reports in that regard yet.

    As a final, bittersweet note: today I found marks in the interior of the front cemented lens group of my Xenon which seem either due to a fungus, cement separation or both. That made me sad, because this seems beyond repair. Not sure yet how this affects images, but the problem is bound to get worse with time. I’ll give it a try with my technician, but I’m skeptical – probably it’s time to start looking for a replacement…

  • I have a Canon Serenar 50mm f/1.9 Leica thread mount that seems to be a direct copy of the Xenon 50mm f/1.9. I haven’t been able to find a whole lot on the history of the lens though outside of this post: https://lens-db.com/canon-serenar-50mm-f19-1949/

  • I did recently acquire an Instamatic Reflex bargain with camera, 50mm f1.9, 35mm f2.8, and 135mm f4, bag, four flashcubes, and paperwork for $160 on eBay. The lenses are very clean. I’m waiting for a DKL to Sony e-mount adapter that will work so that I can use them. The adapters can be problematic. One that I ordered from China through Amazon didn’t work (neither copy). I’ve just been notified from B&H that the Fotodiox adapter will be available again in limited quantities and have ordered one. I found the DKL to m42 adapter by Yeenon that Cheyenne recommends (eBay) but it’s more than $100 so I’ll hold of on it though I would like to get one eventually. m42 is so versatile.
    Thank you for a great article on an undervalued lens manufacturer (SK) and this wonderful lens, the Xenon. There are so many great vintage lenses, but sadly so little information on most of them. It’s a joy to find and read an article like this.

Leave a Reply

Cheyenne Morrison

In today’s digitally obsessed world I've chosen to return to old-school analogue photography, vintage cameras, classic manual focus lenses, and expired film. This combination of elements results in images that cannot be created digitally.

All stories by:Cheyenne Morrison