The Wirgin Edixa Reflex B is Everything I Love and Hate About Film Cameras

The Wirgin Edixa Reflex B is Everything I Love and Hate About Film Cameras

2800 1575 James Tocchio

I spent the past week shooting the Wirgin Edixa Reflex B, a West German-made SLR from the 1950s, and when I took it this weekend to a Boston film photographer meet, the reactions around it were varied and insightful. The Edixa was described by my fellow photo geeks with words like “adorable,” “magical,” “weird,” and “stupid.” Paradoxically, every one of those descriptors was and is accurate.

The Edixa Reflex B is magical and weird. And it’s beautiful and clumsy. It’s everything I love about classic cameras and everything that frustrates me about them, both at the same time.

A Quick History of the Wirgin Edixa Reflex Camera

The Wirgin camera company was founded in Wiesbaden, Germany in 1920 by three brothers, Heinrich, Max, and Josef Wirgin. In 1927, Wirgin produced their first branded camera, the stunningly elegant Edinex, and in 1934 they produced a well-respected 127 camera called the Gewirette. Along with these important machines, the company quickly became known for manufacturing compact, affordable cameras.

In 1936, as Nazi persecution of Jews intensified, the three Wirgin brothers fled Germany and moved to the United States. There they waited out the war while their company back home was expropriated by the Nazis, and folded into the German photographic materials manufacturer Adox. Following the war, Heinrich Wirgin (who had now changed his name to Henry Wirgin) returned to Germany and with the help of the U.S. Government, once again became head of the Wirgin company.

Around 1948, a former German soldier, prisoner of war, and relatively unknown technical mechanic named Heinz Waaske, developed a prototype (at home and in his spare time) for a 16mm miniature camera. He then sold that design to an American firm, after which he began looking for further work in the camera industry. He was introduced to Wirgin, where he found employment as a camera technician. He quickly rose within the company, becoming the head of the prototype workshop, then a technical designer, and finally landing the job of chief designer. He then went on to streamline production, invent new products, and increase profitability of the Wirgin company by implementing innovative design and manufacturing methodologies.

Waaske, by most accounts, was an intuitive genius. Without formal training in engineering or design, he produced some truly remarkable products. This is most easily illustrated through the story of his most successful machine, a prototype camera that he developed in the 1960s while still working at Wirgin. This tiny prototype camera had a collapsible lens, a fundamentally new type of shutter, a totally unique film transport mechanism, and it was all packed into the smallest 35mm film camera body ever made to that point in time.

This prototype was shown to Waaske’s employer Heinrich Wirgin, who balked, and informed Waaske that he’d been planning to exit the camera manufacturing business in short order. Dismayed but not defeated, Waaske then showed his prototype to Leitz (maker of the Leica camera) and Kodak (who’d been producing a long-running and well-regarded series of cameras in Germany for nearly thirty years, the Kodak Retinas) but both firms showed little interest in Waaske or his prototype camera.

In 1965, Waaske found work at Rollei, but he was hesitant to show his prototype machine after the lukewarm response it had received elsewhere. There, mostly by accident, his managing director Dr. Peezel happened to catch a glimpse of Waaske’s prototype camera. Dr. Peezel was taken with the machine’s sophisticated design and its tiny form factor, and immediately directed Waaske to pursue refining the design with the aim of manufacturing the camera. In 1966 the finished prototype debuted to the world as a real product, the now legendary Rollei 35. This camera went on to be one of the most successful 35mm film cameras in history (and one of my favorite cameras, as it were).

But before any of that, Waaske was still developing machines for Wirgin, and by the early-to-mid 1950s, he’d decided to design West Germany’s first mirror reflex camera for 35mm film. This camera was the Wirgin Komet, a workhorse camera unhappily saddled with a name that other manufacturer’s claimed infringed on trademarks. As a result, the Komet was renamed Edixa, and 1954 saw the release of the first Edixa Reflex, which was essentially an improved Komet.

The Edixa Reflex line went on to be West Germany’s most popular, successful, and respected 35mm film SLRs. Waaske and Wirgin had made a magical machine.

What is a Wirgin Edixa Reflex?

Wirgin’s Edixa Reflex was produced for many years, and the range is therefore comprised of many models. But all of these share a similar (if not identical) basic framework – Edixa Reflex cameras are 35mm film SLRs. They use a focal plane shutter, feature the M42 Universal Screw Mount, have swappable prisms and focusing screens, feature rapid advance levers, and various degrees of mechanical sophistication depending on model.

The first Edixa Reflex lacks the automatic aperture mechanism found in later models, meaning that lenses must be manually stopped down prior to shooting and after focusing (which is typically done with the lens at its brightest wide-open setting). Later machines, the Reflex B and onward, feature automatic aperture mechanisms which stop-down at the moment of shutter release. The Reflex B, however, does lack automatic mirror return, meaning that after the shutter is fired the viewfinder is blacked out until the film advance lever is actuated and the shutter cocked (later model B’s did add the newly-developed mirror return function, but knowing which one you’re buying without having the camera in-hand is a challenge). The Reflex Model C features a simple uncoupled selenium light meter, and the Model D features a simplified shutter control.

Choosing and Shooting the Edixa Reflex B

I chose the Reflex Model B for pragmatic reasons. To start, I find it to be the best looking of the models. With predominantly chromed controls on the top plate (compared to later models’ painted black dials), its stunning stamped geometry, and its utterly utilitarian lines, it is simply a gorgeous piece of photographic sculpture.

Next, I don’t care about having a light meter on a camera that I’m only going to shoot occasionally. The Wirgin Edixa Reflex B will never be my everyday camera. It’s a diversion, a vacation from more serious cameras, and a way to stretch and tear my inert photographic muscles that have become too reliant on automation. Every shot in this review has been taken with no light meter, judging the light entirely by eye and experience (and in some cases this is clearly evident in my missed exposures – but that’s okay).

Lastly, I chose the Model B because it’s the one that I found in working condition. When you find a camera as interesting and beautiful as this in perfect working order for a good working price, you buy it.

Although its fit and finish are somewhat less-than the precision of some other German cameras (think of Zeiss’ clockwork-perfect machines of the era, and even Kodak’s Retina series), the Edixa Reflex is hefty enough that it constantly exudes the feel of old-world craft. Advancing the film presents the delightful mechanical noises of all the best film cameras. The front-mounted shutter release button depresses smoothly and softly, and shutter release is deliberate, snappy, and smooth.

The fitted waist-level finder is not only charming and delightful in the same old-world way as the rest of the camera, it’s also amazingly bright and vibrant. This, of course, will change depending on the maximum aperture of the lens fitted to the front of the machine, but even with the relatively sluggish 50mm f/2.8 lens which came packed with mine, there’ve been only a few issues focusing in even darkened environments. Focus accuracy is helped along by an adorable magnifier that, with the flick of a fingernail, flips into place for precise focus. I used this constantly. It’s amazing, and I love it.

There’s a shutter release lock, a film frame counter, a film reminder dial, and slow shutter speed selector hidden beneath the shutter speed dial. All of these controls are firm and compliant. Dials click into their detents with mechanical precision, and switches, knobs, and levers provide the tactile feedback that makes classic cameras the rewarding experience that their digital successors so often aren’t.

Shooting the Edixa is fun, and the sentimental swooning of the last few paragraphs espouse the truth that the Edixa Reflex B is everything I love about classic cameras. Now let’s spend some words talking about why it’s also everything I hate about classic cameras.

Practical Use

The waist-level finder is adorable and magical, as I’ve mentioned, especially to those who’ve never seen one. In fact, these words “adorable and magical” are not my own. They were exclaimed by a young photographer who used it to describe the experience the first time she looked down through the top of the camera and saw her friend rendered there in the finder’s miniature focusing screen. And she was right. It is adorable and magical. But it’s also a challenge.

This is because the waist-level finder, as experienced shooters will know, presents a mirrored image of whatever’s funneling into the lens. That means that any adjustment in angle or framing or composition becomes an exercise in breaking habits, the result for the dim-witted among us (that’s me) is that many shots will be just a bit mis-framed, or show undesired Dutch Tilt (no offense to the Dutch – I love their cameras).

Fitting the eye-level prism finder naturally solves the problem, if we can call this a problem. But I found that it also strips the machine of much of its charm. Call me an anachronistic nincompoop, but if my 35mm SLR came from the factory with a waist-level finder (and these cameras did – the prism was an add-on accessory), then that’s what I’m going to use. And suffer for it.

And then there’s the shutter speed dial. To start, it’s one of those spring-loaded, lift-and-twist dials that users of the oldest 35mm film cameras will recognize. To change speeds we must lift the outer ring of the dial and twist it to our desired speed, then drop it back down into place. Distances between the demarcations aren’t uniform, which is vaguely annoying, and the distances between the higher shutter speeds are so close to one another on the face of the dial that it’s often a finicky task to choose the desired fast speed. Its design also means that it’s impossible to adjust the shutter speed without actually looking at the dial, not a problem when using the waist-level-finder, but when looking through a prism it’s quite a pain (though I believe later Edixa Reflex models added a speed indicator in the VF).

But the worst offense of this shutter speed dial is that it’s also a moving part of the shutter mechanism. Many cameras from the early days of 35mm film have these types of dials. When the shutter is cocked and the film advanced, the dial spins with the loaded springwork underneath (clockwise in the case of the Edixa). When the shutter is released, it snaps back anti-clockwise. The problem with this, is that if the photographer is not careful and his or her finger is resting on this dial at the time of shutter release (with even the slightest touch) the shutter dial will drag or halt altogether, and subsequently the shutter itself will drag or halt. This, of course, causes uneven and prolonged exposures. It’s important, therefore, to remember to keep our digits away from this dial at all times.

This is the part of the camera that was described by an observing photo geek as “stupid,” with an unprintable expletive added for emphasis. Ever the champion of stupid, old cameras, I tried to make excuses and reason with him that with the right touch and fifteen years of continuous practice it might be possible to leverage this design drawback into a kind of haptic exposure compensation dial. By intentionally dragging the dial when we release the shutter, we could almost create a sort of organic exposure compensation or backlight mode! It’s genius, really.

But I was reaching, and he was right. It is pretty stupid.

And then there’s the film transport problems. I’ve had plenty of cameras stutter when advancing film. Slipped sprockets, take-up spools that are too wimpy to pull the film lead a full frame with one actuation of the advance lever, jagged metal spools that rip acetate. The Wirgin Edixa Reflex B (or at the least, my particular Reflex B) did all of these things. All told, I lost five frames across two 36 exposure rolls to various film transport faults, and while this could easily be a problem limited to the individual example in my hands, I’m not convinced. These cameras were made to a price point, and not all components are as precise as those found in other same-era cameras. It’s possible that all of these Edixas have some degree of quirk. Though not a deal-breaker in any way, these flaws have been a part of my user experience that’s impossible to ignore.

With all of these foibles combined, shooting the Reflex B is a somewhat slower process than I’m used to, and one that will certainly be slower for a majority of shooters. We spend most of our time clutching Nikons and Canons and Leica Ms. These Japanese and pinnacle German cameras are refined and perfected in a way that the Wirgin simply isn’t.

For me, that’s not a bad thing. The Wirgin slowed things down and kept me on my toes. It made me miss some shots, but that’s okay. Because it’s a charming, beautiful, fun camera.


For all its quirks, I do love the Wirgin Edixa Reflex B. It’s a joy to shoot. For those of us who love classic cameras, it’s a winner. It won’t replace the daily shooter, it can’t hold a candle to more modern machines or even the best machines of its own era. But it doesn’t really need to. It’s a camera that makes you fall in love with shooting film, and for most people that will be enough.

The added gravitas of its heritage helps it stand out among the countless other affordable, everyman film cameras floating around today. It was the brainchild of one of the most talented designers to craft a camera, and even if only to own a touchstone of that man’s career, the Wirgin Edixa Reflex is worth owning. It may not be the best camera, or the most collectible, or the most capable, but it’s pretty special anyway.

Find a Wirgin Edixa Reflex B on eBay

Get one from our own F Stop Cameras

Follow Casual Photophile on Facebook and Instagram

[Some of the links in this article will direct users to our affiliates at B&H Photo, Amazon, and eBay. By purchasing anything using these links, Casual Photophile may receive a small commission at no additional charge to you. This helps Casual Photophile produce the content we produce. Many thanks for your support.]

James Tocchio

James Tocchio is a writer and photographer, and the founder of Casual Photophile. He’s spent years researching, collecting, and shooting classic and collectible cameras. In addition to his work here, he’s also the founder of the online camera shop

All stories by:James Tocchio
  • Don’t all the Barnack Leicas have the same “moving shutter dial” quirk?

    • You’re right and lots of the older 35mm film cameras have this. Leicas, Nikon rangefinders, some Contax cameras. It’s not unique, just something that caused a few stumbles in this particular case due to the dial’s positioning and prominence.

      • James, which Contax cameras are you referring to? Zeiss rangefinders, the II/III and the IIa/IIIa and none have rotating shutter dials. Are you referring to the very first slr’s, the S,D and F?

  • I prefer the carved from a battleship solidity of the Contarex to the Wirgin-Edixa. Everyone I know who has had one of these has had feed problems and I could not live with that. I never had a feed problem with my father’s Contarex and as far as I am aware, neither did he, albeit he did not use it that much, finding that with the 55mm f1,4 Planar, it was too heavy, compared with his LTM Leicas.

  • Dammit, now I want one!

  • Nothing but cool.

  • I too love the Wirgin Edixa, and the styling and quirky aspects are appealing, they can also be picked up quite cheaply. However, added to what James has said the cameras were generally poor quality compared to the East German counterparts liked Carl Zeiss Jena’s Contax, the Praktica, Praktina and etc. This is a really fascinating and detailed history of the company, here is the segment were he writes about Wirgin’s quality control…

    “It was very interesting and constructive seeing the production methods at Gebr.Wirgin compared with the ones at Zeiss Ikon AG. At Zeiss Ikon all the camera parts were produced with the finest precision and finish, and only small adjustments were needed during assembly. At Gebr. Wirgin on the other hand the finish was much rougher, and technicians filed and polished until everything functioned satisfactorily. I was quite shocked to see how the screw heads were secured. The metal surrounding the screw head was simply struck with a conical punch to extrude the metal into contact with the screw head to lock the screw against turning. One can imagine the damage and the trouble it created for repairs. The colleagues told me that once a technician wanted to simplify the process by leaving the cameras in the transport-boxes in which they were carried along the assembly line, while the screws were hit by the tool. To the general amusement of everyone the bottom of the transport-box fell out.”

    The History of Kamerawerk Gebr.Wirgin and Edixa Reflex seen from my point of view by Klaus-Eckard Riess

    The one camera they company made that is desirable is the Edixa Electronica, which was revolutionary when it was released and goes for quite a lot, but it is more so that it is collectable rather than being a great camera to shoot with.

    • Even in the 1970’s, local photographic dealers were putting me off buying a used Edixa slr due to poor quality construction. Many wouldn’t even trade them in as they were not prepared to offer guarantees on re-sale. Being heavy isn’t a sign of being good. Now, 40 to 50 years on, buying a used one must be even more of a risk. If it’s cheap, really cheap, perhaps, but looking on ebay prices don’t reflect the risk. Reading Cheyenne’s post, one can understand why.

  • I have waist level finders w pop out magnifiers for my Nikon F and F2. Great for tripod work or really low level in the weeds shots. It’s like using a reliable less quircky Wirgin!

  • It sure looks nice. One of the things about using old cameras is that you gain an understanding of why new cameras evolved to have the features they do. Prisms, light meters, etc. all became standard items to overcome some quirk or shortcoming in the existing technology, or at least to make things more convenient and eliminate poor photos.

  • Griping about waist level finder and rotating shutter speed dial in them of themselves seem unfair and off base. You could compare them to such features on other cameras and declare them lacking, but that isn’t really what you’re doing, is it? Cameras like the Mirandas and Nikon F and Rolleiflex TLR all had waist level finding. Is this one’s focusing screen darker? Is its magnifier worse? What focusing screens are available? Which one did you use? You mention they made eye level finder but you didn’t want to use it? Did you have one available to test?

    On the rotating shutter speed dial, are you saying that it is MORE likely to get caught or inadvertently knocked than equivalent dial on dozens of other camera models?

    Excellent info on the M42 lens mount and relative ease/difficulty of assessing if a particular body has what kind of auto aperture function or not. I do wish you had gone into this a bit more, though, as m42 is one of the most common and important lens mount groups out there. In the real world one can mount anything from a Pentax Takumar 35mn f/2 to cheap but popular 58mm f2 /Helio 44 variants to fast 1.4 lenses.

    How does this camera body fit in a M42 family? Because ergonomics are an odd thing: the Fujica M42s, for example, are probably the fastest M42 cameras to use with 1980s smooth film advance, bright focusing screens with split image microprisms, etc. The Pentax spotmatics might be the sturdiest. The contax ones may be the prettiest. Etc. How does this stack against those?


    • My father had an Edixa model B and I often wondered if my fathers eyesight (unknown to him) was somewhat defective as quite a few of the results were simply out of focus ! A few years later I took up photography myself and borrowed his camera to give it a try and was astounded at how dim and grainy the image appeared in the Pentaprism ! My father by then had started to use a waist level viewfinder, which was actually quite good and produced much better results. My reward for improving my opinion of has photographic work was being presented with a second hand Edixa Kadet (1/500th max speed ) on my 16th Birthday . I used this camera constantly for about 15 years after this – mainly with the Pentaprism, until the shutter gave up.The results, in my opinion, were excellent and are generally equal to any of the cameras I have used to date. As a postscript my father latter admitted he wasn’t impressed with the clarity of the Pentaprism on his model B so just used to guess the distance and use a small aperture !

  • Interesting enough almost the next day after reading this someone gave me this exact model for free. Apart from a sticky focus, the curtains have what appear to be spots of mould on them. Anyone got any ideas of how to get rid of them? The shutter fires accurately BTW.

  • Nice article about the Wirgin. I was wondering if the “Boston film photographer meet” you referred to is a regular event. Is this through a club? I clicked on the CP Camera Club link, but I just see a blank white page there.

  • I enjoy using my early production Edixa Reflex, hauling the 50mm Gottingen Westagon . My camera had the film transport issue ,which was easily fixed. Otherwise it has been a delight to use, once I grew accustomed to it’s lens mounted shutter button.

  • wow! I like it so much. I really want to own one

  • Hey James!! This is a super interesting and helpful post as I just bought one of these cool cameras. Any chance you’d be willing to hop on a Zoom sometime and teach me and my husband how to use it? Since there aren’t that many out there, we’re having a hard time finding someone to walk us through it!

  • Thank you for this interesting, thoughtful review. I agree that the design is very beautiful!

  • Overall this is a great camera. I found one in my basement last spring and it launched me into a whirlwind of photography bliss. At the time I was a clueless teenager. wondering what that beautiful camera was, I googled it, this great article was the first result. That led to me frantically researching photography, wondering what exposure was, what all the little numbers meant. I found myself frequently coming back to this website, reading all sorts of articles learning how to operate a film camera. While I use the Edixa less and less preferring the Nikon F3 that was also in the box, I find myself wanting to put another roll through it.

    I’m now printing my work in a darkroom, fully embracing the analogue workflow. I have Casual Photophile to thank for that, I really appreciate all you do here at Casual Photophile, thank you for introducing me to this wonderful hobby and artform.

Leave a Reply

James Tocchio

James Tocchio is a writer and photographer, and the founder of Casual Photophile. He’s spent years researching, collecting, and shooting classic and collectible cameras. In addition to his work here, he’s also the founder of the online camera shop

All stories by:James Tocchio